Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F011410B6D for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:51:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66846 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2015 21:51:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 66805 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2015 21:51:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66795 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2015 21:51:24 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:51:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 73E8D1AA887 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:51:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.202 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sAfY7Pxygn5M for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 92FB520381 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from malf.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.59]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDE413A3D88 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:49:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:45:23 -0700 (PDT) From: vkulichenko To: user@ignite.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: <1440107123209-1080.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1440024194155-1067.post@n6.nabble.com> References: <1440024194155-1067.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: IgniteCache (key, value ) design question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Key access is always faster than queries, so I would recommend to go with the second option. BTW, you can use fields from key object in queries as well as fields from value object, so your query will work either way. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/IgniteCache-key-value-design-question-tp1067p1080.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.