From issues-return-64793-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@ignite.apache.org Tue May 15 12:44:04 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2744918076D for ; Tue, 15 May 2018 12:44:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 65818 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2018 10:44:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 65809 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2018 10:44:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2018 10:44:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 72FBE1A09C8 for ; Tue, 15 May 2018 10:44:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.511 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ptg8F-e1KbSK for ; Tue, 15 May 2018 10:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 32A385F2C2 for ; Tue, 15 May 2018 10:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 62D50E0C50 for ; Tue, 15 May 2018 10:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 214D3217A0 for ; Tue, 15 May 2018 10:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 10:44:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Stanislav Lukyanov (JIRA)" To: issues@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-8486) Update ConcurrentLinkedDeque in Ignite's master repository to the latest JDK version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16475647#comment-16475647 ] Stanislav Lukyanov commented on IGNITE-8486: -------------------------------------------- TC seems OK: https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=1289753&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll [~agura], could you please review? > Update ConcurrentLinkedDeque in Ignite's master repository to the latest JDK version > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: IGNITE-8486 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8486 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Stanislav Lukyanov > Assignee: Stanislav Lukyanov > Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.6 > > > Ignite still uses copies of several JSR 166 (j.u.concurrent) classes in it's sources. Those copies are now outdated compared to the latest versions used in JDK. > In particular, `ConcurrentLinkedDeque` has received a couple of correctness fixes recently (https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188900, https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189387). It would be good to have them in Ignite as well to protect ourselves from possible issues. > The task is to update Ignite's `ConcurrentLinkedDeque8` to the latest version of `ConcurrentLinkedDeque`, although keeping compatibility with earlier Java version (e.g. JDK's version now uses Java 9's VarHandles which we can't use yet). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)