Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC5A200CB5 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:01:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E94D91689B7; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A8541689A2 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:01:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 95247 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2017 16:01:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 95238 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2017 16:01:24 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:01:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EEEE1196241 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:01:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7auID6GC4Azz for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0C60D6245D for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5C62CE0069 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1CB9B246F9 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:01:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Evgenii Zhuravlev (JIRA)" To: issues@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-5597) Wrong javadoc in Affinity and AffinityFunction for REPLICATED cache MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:01:26 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16084222#comment-16084222 ] Evgenii Zhuravlev commented on IGNITE-5597: ------------------------------------------- >For fully replicated caches this method the same way as a partitioned cache. I think you've forgot verb here. > Wrong javadoc in Affinity and AffinityFunction for REPLICATED cache > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-5597 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5597 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.7 > Reporter: Evgenii Zhuravlev > Assignee: Andrei Yakushin > Labels: javadoc > Fix For: 2.2 > > > RendezvousAffinityFunction.getPartitions() Javadoc says: > {code:java} > * Note that for fully replicated caches this method should always > * return {@code 1}. > {code} > but it's not true, it works the same as PARTITIONED cache. > Affinity.mapKeyToNode(K key) javadoc says: > {code:java} > *
  • > * For fully replicated caches first node ID returned by {@link AffinityFunction} > * is returned. > *
  • > *
  • For partitioned caches, primary node for the given key is returned.
  • > {code} > it looks confusing, while REPLICATED cache has primary nodes for keys as PRATITIONED. > Also, > {code:java} > * Provides affinity information to detect which node is primary and which nodes are > * backups for a partitioned cache. > {code} > Affinity matter for REPLICATED cache too. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)