Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE13200C85 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 03:57:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 2A8EC160BCE; Tue, 16 May 2017 01:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 70F1E160BC2 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 03:57:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 35196 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2017 01:57:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 35187 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2017 01:57:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 May 2017 01:57:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4881B1A7A7F for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 01:57:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yhn1Nj7Oe1dw for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 01:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6B7B25FAF9 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 01:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A1EC8E09D6 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 01:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id A8E082437C for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 01:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 01:57:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Denis Magda (JIRA)" To: issues@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5114) Parallalel plus/multiply matrix algorithms. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 16 May 2017 01:57:09 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Denis Magda updated IGNITE-5114: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 2.1 > Parallalel plus/multiply matrix algorithms. > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-5114 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5114 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ml > Reporter: Yury Babak > Assignee: Yury Babak > Fix For: 2.1 > > > We need design and implement parallel(distributed?) versions of matrix plus/multiply algorithms because current implementation is implemented by definition. Those implementations is really slow. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)