Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FE8200C38 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:57:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D475D160B78; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 29077160B70 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:57:45 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 4706 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2017 07:57:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 4697 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2017 07:57:44 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:57:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CA3901AFB99 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:57:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.451 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.451 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lcdGSt1AEnmj for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id B03405FE3A for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1D00CE087E for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 99C8F243AC for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:57:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Evans Ye (JIRA)" To: issues@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-4450) Explicit lock is not released when node that acquired it is killed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:57:46 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15925698#comment-15925698 ] Evans Ye commented on IGNITE-4450: ---------------------------------- Hi team, This is fixed and committed to the code base, however I can't find patch file or PR attached on this JIRA. It would be better to have the code attached here so that user/developer can reference and learn how the bug gets fixed. BTW, thanks for the fix. > Explicit lock is not released when node that acquired it is killed > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: IGNITE-4450 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4450 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: cache > Affects Versions: 1.8 > Reporter: Valentin Kulichenko > Assignee: Semen Boikov > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 1.9 > > Attachments: ExplicitLockTest.java > > > Test is attached. The scenario is the following: > # Start first node and create a transactional cache. > # Start second node and acquire a lock. > # Kill second node after several seconds without doing unlock. > # Try to start third node. It can't join because the lock is still held for some reason. The result if hanged cluster. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)