ignite-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-3639) IGFS: Local secondary: investigate whether we need BufferedOutputStream for create/append.
Date Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:15:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15420646#comment-15420646
] 

Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-3639:
-----------------------------------------

Taras,

I removed buffer size properties form public API at the moment. This way we can release first
version without waiting for this ticket to complete. And irrespective of your findings we
will not break backward compatibility or compilation in further versions.

Let's restore buffer size getter/setter if you find that buffering makes sense.

> IGFS: Local secondary: investigate whether we need BufferedOutputStream for create/append.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-3639
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3639
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: IGFS
>    Affects Versions: 1.6
>            Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
>            Assignee: Taras Ledkov
>             Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> We already have a buffer inside {{IgfsOutputStreamImpl}}. Do we really need to wrap {{FileOutputStream}}
into another buffer?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message