ignite-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Denis Magda (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-3261) AffinityKey is not stored in the metadata cache
Date Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:38:21 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Denis Magda updated IGNITE-3261:
    Attachment: Ignite-MarshallBenchmark.zip

> AffinityKey is not stored in the metadata cache
> -----------------------------------------------
>                 Key: IGNITE-3261
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3261
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cache
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0.final
>            Reporter: Denis Magda
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: community, important
>             Fix For: 1.7
>         Attachments: Ignite-MarshallBenchmark.zip
> Presently we don't register predefined and system classes in metadata cache which can
lead to significant performance drops when these types used as keys.
> As an example we have {{AffinityKey}} class. It's not registered in the metadata cache
and as a result client nodes don't update their {{CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl.clientMetaDataCache}}.
After that when a client node needs to get {{AffinityKey}} metadata using {{CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl.metadata(typeId)}}
it will always call metadata cache and this is a bottleneck. The drop can be significant because
this method is called from methods like {{GridAffinityProcessor.mapKeyToPrimaryAndBackups}}.
> In attach you can find a simple benchmark that shows how slower a result if AffinityKey
is used.
> As a solution we can register {{AffinityKey}} and other system and predefined classes
(?) in the metadata cache.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message