ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
Date Thu, 26 Dec 2019 16:32:05 GMT
A huge +1 for adding Spring Data related fixes/improvements. Ilya is right
that Spring Data related questions sparked last time due to missing support
of 2.2 version.

Ilya, could you elaborate on what you mean under "bumping the versions"? Do
you suggest performing a straightforward upgrade of "ignite-spring-data" to
version 2.2 and introducing "ignite-spring-data-{old-version"} for the
previous versions? If it's so, I fully agree with the proposal.

-
Denis


On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 4:52 AM Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnacheev@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I propose to add the following ticket to the scope:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12259 (3 commits, be careful
> with release version)
>
> Adding tickets to scope surely seems crazy now, but I will provide the
> following considerations:
> * This is Spring Data 2.2 integration, which we currently do not have,
> leading to lots of confused questions on stack overflow and mailing list.
> Spring Data is important to our public image since many people may learn
> about out project by starting with Spring Data.
>
> * It has zero code impact outside of its own module (just 2 POM file
> touched and that's all).
>
> * The core was ready since early November but, due to gmail quirk, we did
> not react to it in time.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Another semi-related question. *Should we bump our dependencies' versions
> before releasing 2.8?* I talk mainly about spring and hibernate
> dependencies. We could switch them to their latest maintenance versions to
> avoid shipping default links to outdated packages.
>
> I think this is one of things that are very hard to do between releases, so
> I think this dependencies bumping should be a part of a formal
> release/testing cycle, and then be backported to master.
>
> I could volunteer to do that myself, if we agree to merge these version
> upgrades to ignite-2.8 and then re-test.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> вт, 24 дек. 2019 г. в 13:22, Zhenya Stanilovsky <arzamas123@mail.ru.invalid
> >:
>
> >
> > Igniters, i`l try to compare 2.8 release candidate vs 2.7.6,
> > last sha 2.8 was build from :  9d114f3137f92aebc2562a
> > i use yardstick benchmarks, 4 bare machine with:  2x Xeon X5570 96Gb
> 512GB
> > SSD 2048GB HDD 10GB/s
> > 1 for  client (driver) and 3 for servers.
> > this mappings for graphs and real yardstick tests:
> >
> > atomic-put: IgnitePutBenchmark
> > sql-merge-query: IgniteSqlMergeQueryBenchmark
> > atomic-get: IgniteGetBenchmark
> > tx-get: IgniteGetTxBenchmark
> > tx-put: IgnitePutTxBenchmark
> > atomic-put-all-bs-10: IgnitePutAllBenchmark
> > tx-put-all-bs-10: IgnitePutAllTxBenchmark
> >
> > cacheMode — partitioned
> > CacheWriteSynchronizationMode.FULL_SYNC
> > 1 backup
> >
> > 1. wal = log_only 2. wal = none 3. persistence disabled.
> > Thanks Maxim for wiki page [1]
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Benchmarks
> >
> > do we need some bisect or other work here ?
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >------- Forwarded message -------
> > >From: "Maxim Muzafarov" < mmuzaf@apache.org >
> > >To:  dev@ignite.apache.org
> > >Cc:
> > >Subject: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
> > >Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 14:44:31 +0300
> > >
> > >Igniters,
> > >
> > >
> > >It's almost a year has passed since the last major Apache Ignite 2.7
> > >has been released. We've accumulated a lot of performance improvements
> > >and a lot of new features which are waiting for their release date.
> > >Here is my list of the most interesting things from my point since the
> > >last major release:
> > >
> > >Service Grid,
> > >Monitoring,
> > >Recovery Read
> > >BLT auto-adjust,
> > >PDS compression,
> > >WAL page compression,
> > >Thin client: best effort affinity,
> > >Thin client: transactions support (not yet)
> > >SQL query history
> > >SQL statistics
> > >
> > >I think we should no longer wait and freeze the master branch anymore
> > >and prepare the next major release by the end of the year.
> > >
> > >
> > >I propose to discuss Time, Scope of Apache Ignite 2.8 release and also
> > >I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the planning
> > >release.
> > >
> > >Scope Freeze: November 4, 2019
> > >Code Freeze: November 18, 2019
> > >Voting Date: December 10, 2019
> > >Release Date: December 17, 2019
> > >
> > >
> > >WDYT?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message