ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Proposed Release: 2.7.7 = 2.7.6 + ML + extra fixed bugs
Date Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:14:49 GMT
+1 for 2.8

We should not hold master anymore, it has been a year already.

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:42 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov@apache.org> wrote:

> I like both options 2.7.7 & 2.8 both have their benefits.
>
> But someday we will anyway need to release master state. Let's not freeze
> master for years as Zookeeper did with 3.0.
>
> So I like option with 2.8 release more.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 01:42, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > 2.8 release cycle can last for many months due to a number of issues and
> > regressions we need to address. It can easily slip to the next year,
> > especially considering the holiday season. An alternate solution can be a
> > series of Ignite 2.7.x releases that are becoming more hardened with each
> > version and go with a small and manageable changeset. For instance, ML
> and
> > Thin Clients optimizations with fixes for newly discovered critical
> issues
> > can be released in 2.7.7 and 2.7.8.
> >
> > As for 2.8, what exactly are we planning to release there?
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:43 AM Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Start of December for 2.8 sounds good.
> > >
> > > В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 13:38 +0300, Alexey Zinoviev пишет:
> > > > Sounds good for me, I will be ready to release ML module till 1
> > December
> > > > (end of September is not appropriate for ML module due to known
> issues
> > > and
> > > > bugs)
> > > > If the whole Ignite could be released to this date I will be happy in
> > > > another case I suggest the minor release by the formula mentioned
> > above.
> > > >
> > > > Let's ask another module maintainers here?
> > > >
> > > > ср, 18 сент. 2019 г. в 13:00, Maxim Muzafarov <mmuzaf@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > Folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Agree, we should start a discussion about releasing Apache Ignite
> 2.8
> > > > > version right after 2.7.6 will be announced.
> > > > > Am I missing something?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 12:33, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov@apache.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > of 2.7 release
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's 2.8, of course. Sorry, for typo.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 12:36 +0300, Nikolay Izhikov пишет:
> > > > > > > Hello, Alexey
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > we have no chance to
> > > > > > > > release the whole master branch
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why do you think so?
> > > > > > > From my point of view, we should start discussion of 2.7
> release,
> > > > >
> > > > > shortly(end of September of similar)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 12:04 +0300, Alexey Zinoviev пишет:
> > > > > > > > Dear Igniters, for the whole year I'm waiting for
the next
> > > release of
> > > > > > > > Apache Ignite with number 2.8 or 3.0. As I understand
we have
> > no
> > > > >
> > > > > chance to
> > > > > > > > release the whole master branch, but we have cool
changes in
> ML
> > > > >
> > > > > component
> > > > > > > > that were not released since 2.7 (Nomember 2018).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm ready to become a release manager of the special
release
> > with
> > > > >
> > > > > the taste
> > > > > > > > of new ML by the formula: 2.7.6 plus new ML plus all
known
> > fixed
> > > > >
> > > > > issues for
> > > > > > > > 2.7.6 release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Reason: ML has a limited dependency on core/sql component
and
> > > could
> > > > >
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > delivered without major changes in 2.7.6
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I hope to found the support from the community side
and maybe
> > we
> > > > >
> > > > > deliver
> > > > > > > > another components like Thin Clients, Spark integration
and
> > > another
> > > > >
> > > > > ready
> > > > > > > > component without strong ties with core component
in the
> future
> > > > >
> > > > > according
> > > > > > > > this way (in release 2.7.9 for example)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What do you think, Igniters?
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message