ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re[2]: Apache Ignite 2.7.6 (Time, Scope, and Release manager)
Date Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:37:33 GMT
Yes, my bad, forgot to include the link. That's the one.

пт, 30 авг. 2019 г. в 15:01, Maxim Muzafarov <maxmuzaf@gmail.com>:

> Alexey,
>
> Does the issue [1] is related to this [2] discussion on the user-list?
> If yes, I think it is very important to include these fixes to 2.7.6.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12127
> [2]
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Node-failure-with-quot-Failed-to-write-buffer-quot-error-td29100.html
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 14:26, Alexei Scherbakov
> <alexey.scherbakoff@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Alexey,
> >
> > Looks like important fixes, better to include them.
> >
> > пт, 30 авг. 2019 г. в 12:51, Alexey Goncharuk <
> alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > Given that the RC1 vote did not succeed and we are still waiting for a
> few
> > > minor fixes, may I suggest including these two tickest to the 2.7.6
> scope?
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12127
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12128
> > >
> > > The first one has been already reported on the dev-list [1], the
> second one
> > > may cause a state when an Ignite node cannot start on existing
> persisted
> > > data. Looking at the tickets, the fixes should be reasonably easy, so
> it
> > > should not shift 2.7.6 release timeline much.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > ср, 28 авг. 2019 г. в 15:25, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Separate repos for different Spark version is a good idea for me.
> > > > Anyway, can you help with Spark version migration,  for now?
> > > >
> > > > В Ср, 28/08/2019 в 15:20 +0300, Alexey Zinoviev пишет:
> > > > > Maybe the best solution today add for each new version of Spark the
> > > > > sub-module (Spark-2.3, Spark-2.4) or the separate repository with
> > > modules
> > > > > for each version or another way with separate repository and
> different
> > > > > branches like in
> > > https://github.com/datastax/spark-cassandra-connector
> > > > >
> > > > > 3 ways to support different versions with the different costs of
> > > support
> > > > >
> > > > > In the case of separate repository I could help, for example
> > > > >
> > > > > ср, 28 авг. 2019 г. в 14:57, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov@apache.org
> >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello, Alexey.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > But the
> > > > > > > compatibility with Spark 2.3 will be broken, isn't it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do you have any
> > > > > > > plans to support the different version of Spark without
loosing
> > > your
> > > > > >
> > > > > > unique
> > > > > > > expertise in Spark-Ignite integration?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you mean by "my unique expertise"? :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How do you see support of several Spark version?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > В Ср, 28/08/2019 в 14:29 +0300, Alexey Zinoviev пишет:
> > > > > > > Dear Nikolay Izhikov
> > > > > > > Are you going to update the Ignite-Spark integration for
Spark
> 2.4.
> > > > But
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > compatibility with Spark 2.3 will be broken, isn't it?
Do you
> have
> > > > any
> > > > > > > plans to support the different version of Spark without
loosing
> > > your
> > > > > >
> > > > > > unique
> > > > > > > expertise in Spark-Ignite integration?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > чт, 15 авг. 2019 г. в 14:54, Nikolay Izhikov <
> nizhikov@apache.org
> > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello, Igniters.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I try to upgrade Spark version but failed.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Seems, internal Spark API(External Catalog, SQL planner)
> that we
> > > > use
> > > > > > > > changed a lot.
> > > > > > > > So it will take some time to upgrade version.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For now, I work hard to complete the second phase
of IEP-35
> so I
> > > > > >
> > > > > > postpone
> > > > > > > > upgrade Spark version to Ignite 2.8.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > В Чт, 15/08/2019 в 14:51 +0300, Dmitriy Pavlov
пишет:
> > > > > > > > > Hi Denis,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Sure, since code freeze is planned for today,
I don't mind
> to
> > > > include
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > bug.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ivan, could you complete this issue by 20 August?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > BTW #1, Dmitriy Govoruchnin, please reply about
commit for
> > > > > > > > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953?src=confmacro
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > BTW #2, FYI, release page is now available here
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.7.6
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > BTW #3, FYI, release related test PR is here
> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6775 and
it's TC Bot
> > > > report is
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > here:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=ignite-2.7.6&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.7.6
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > чт, 15 авг. 2019 г. в 13:55, Denis Magda
<
> dmagda@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > An Ignite user just reported a silly issue
that needs to
> be
> > > > fixed
> > > > > >
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2.7.6:
> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12068
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > More details and context:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57479636/simple-select-query-missing-rows-in-ignite
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Ivan, please help us to make it to the release.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:47 AM Denis Magda
<
> > > dmagda@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > IGNITE-12507 (Persistence files are
stored to temp
> dir) has
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > definitely be
> > > > > > > > > > > added the scope and treated one of
the main release
> > > drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry, please let us know once the
release wiki page
> is
> > > > ready so
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > that we
> > > > > > > > > > > can finalize the timelines based on
chosen scope.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:12 PM Dmitriy
Pavlov <
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dpavlov@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to everyone, who participated
in the
> discussion.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to wait also fix
for
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12057
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > and discussion results for that
issue:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/498a14b3971950a45ef57f45cc23d2438ce1afba000b586e230927bf@%3Cdev.ignite.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Since some issues are still open,
we'll probably move
> > > some
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dates
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > forward,
> > > > > > > > > > > > but it seems we managed to discuss
scope before scope
> > > > freeze.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I consider now the scope is frozen
- no new feature
> can
> > > be
> > > > > >
> > > > > > added
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > to the
> > > > > > > > > > > > scope of 2.7.6. We're entering
the rampdown phase.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > See
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process
> > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > more details.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 12 авг. 2019 г. в 16:37,
Zhenya Stanilovsky
> > > > > > > > > > > > <arzamas123@mail.ru.invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > > > :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi al,, i also suggest to
append [1], cause it
> could
> > > > produce
> > > > > > > > > > > > > CorruptedTreeException in
some scenario.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12061
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we include
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12060
?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019
at 10:04 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > nizhikov@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, Deni.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nickolay,
could you check if that's a quick
> > > > upgrade?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I will take
a look.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > В Чт, 08/08/2019
в 11:08 -0700, Denis Magda
> пишет:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please add
this BTree corruption fix to the
> > > scope:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Plus, I would
upgrade our Spark integration
> to
> > > > version
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2.4
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > long
> > > > > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.3
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > goes with
limitations reported by our users:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12054
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nickolay,
could you check if that's a quick
> > > > upgrade?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug
8, 2019 at 10:40 AM Dmitriy
> Pavlov <
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > dpavlov@apache.org >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ivan,
Ilya, Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would
like this release would be as
> minimal
> > > as
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > possible.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > According
to dates proposed we could freeze
> > > > scope at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 12.08, 4
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > days
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > than
enough to stand up and say, ‘Hey, I
> have
> > > an
> > > > > >
> > > > > > urgent
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > fix’.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But
> > > > > > > > > > > > > it is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also
ok for me if we decide to have more
> > > relaxed
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dates.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For now,
I suppose the following fixed
> should
> > > be
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > cherry-picked:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11767
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (Blocker)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GridDhtPartitionsFullMessage
retains huge
> maps
> > > on
> > > > > >
> > > > > > heap in
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > exchange
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > history
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10451
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (Major
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Bug)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > .NET:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Persistence
does not work with custom
> affinity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > function
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9562
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (Critical
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Bug)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Destroyed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cache
that resurrected on an old offline
> node
> > > > breaks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PME
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I
will continue to research JIRA.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy
Pavlov
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > чт,
8 авг. 2019 г. в 17:30, Павлухин Иван <
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > vololo100@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> What's the scope for this release?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Same question.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
On the other hand an idea of 2.7.6
> release
> > > > > >
> > > > > > attracts me
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > > > having
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
a practice of doing frequent minor
> releases
> > > can
> > > > > >
> > > > > > help
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > us to
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > build
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
reliable and predictable release rails.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 15:09, Ilya
> Kasnacheev <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  ilya.kasnacheev@gmail.com
>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Hello!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> What's the scope for this release?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Ilya Kasnacheev
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 15:07, Dmitriy
> Pavlov
> > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > dpavlov@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Hi Apache Ignite Developers,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > We seem to be on the same page about
> 2.8
> > > > > >
> > > > > > release,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > we’ve
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > started
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > practice - minor releases, the first
> > > > release
> > > > > >
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2.7.5.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > there is a couple of issues still not
> > > > fixed in
> > > > > >
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > release,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > so I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > like to propose to prepare one more
> minor
> > > > > >
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ignite.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > I propose my candidacy to be release
> > > > manager
> > > > > >
> > > > > > once
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > again.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > I could (of course with help from
> Peter
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ivanov) do
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > additional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
efforts
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > to complete and improve process doc
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > I propose (most optimistic) dates for
> > > > release
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > stages:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Scope Freeze: August 12, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Code Freeze: August 15, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Voting Date: August 22, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Release Date: August 27, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > WDYT?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > If nobody minds, I will create branch
> > > 2.7.6
> > > > > >
> > > > > > based
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2.7.5
> > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set up
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > the TC Bot during the weekend.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
--
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Zhenya Stanilovsky
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alexei Scherbakov
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message