From dev-return-42496-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@ignite.apache.org Tue Nov 27 13:56:56 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id F3BC9180670 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:56:55 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 50494 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2018 12:56:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 50482 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2018 12:56:54 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:56:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D6B03C1A84 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:56:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.466 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.466 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.105, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dSyNl-sjYE_6 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot1-f48.google.com (mail-ot1-f48.google.com [209.85.210.48]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 015F160EB6 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f48.google.com with SMTP id e12so15671590otl.5 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 04:56:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=V9prXPCyRBJNomKBsbLha96kkzLxeXuDJWuwSOgOdrk=; b=CXMDZi6uibWC5YyB/9Ppqr/4vYrPX2Ss7vB/uQU/4Hupx5xrN2xavBXhEpw0W07Oct 1zM7DJCSCrDpjKKgGRD1oeTV4obNLU5ICV52nfEFKZtPNwLdLDnF+v6QhU705OCJ1c7G 2kix4scKlkDCg/6X+6KqKSe7qb9jJtby8hywHiMtHK5e+Q72CF/X6B2TeIsAzW2wGlOD Mbew3nUS2HL1BoP/6DvsEf1OX8OCrqC2waug4XpGCCf4G7wcTQiYqgPJGbTWNNYcpvIU xvzqv6VjGGCbo0SP5+w8owy34fbiaVqWHK0AeJSCSKtgRhz+SImSkOskuQjmNwmbzdCa +kmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=V9prXPCyRBJNomKBsbLha96kkzLxeXuDJWuwSOgOdrk=; b=IJqgZbrZC709SXcXJfeLF0RrmSUnH4xRXoWj1VupR5JO0Ftx2Rp6jrwsk8vN11LKB0 pEfEUb2phXA9sMfwGuqpAWANV9U7law8ihYDneZw3ANIp/iD+rdr8zVKNIMN1y+XsTO+ 9fbw4gx1XJoBuRiBPNjIkjvJ48kv5yfRewCnfW5jy1BzEkxNxMO1Xp8orsjgtTOTaJit QoXWIEAh1mmUgeGpbXnsic5ekiQu6jtZHJJYY2BM/zZfGrX9T5syIQAtGbB0VhxpjVe9 rsSoGw9W3asL4GKqU3CYwnTc0XVMH3QrVjCnlf5QFpLSr8Y7Gkpa+XqVTcnsti8CZQjy CVjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZl++yrCJvSZ4QG9q6QT20bapCXvIkpkloa47KCivrhl6a/ImV5 otlpAlhl05hx7HTMg5qpGIRsfg8i7PihNirHAqiSvw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WMI1B96N6IqTIZ8F51bHgWL1Xtilddm61oSwoILaP5dKkXxuYxZKK/tt9Cslp7og9Wczd4SXmQIMQUlb+nkhA= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:12d:: with SMTP id 42mr17097397otu.352.1543323409483; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 04:56:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1543243413308-0.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1543243413308-0.post@n4.nabble.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?0J/QsNCy0LvRg9GF0LjQvSDQmNCy0LDQvQ==?= Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:56:35 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Brainstorm: Make TC Run All faster To: dev@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roman, Do you have some expectations how faster "correlated" tests elimination will make Run All? Also do you have a vision how can we determine such "correlated" tests, can we do it relatively fast? But all in all, I am not sure that reducing a group of correlated tests to only one test can show good stability. =D0=BF=D0=BD, 26 =D0=BD=D0=BE=D1=8F=D0=B1. 2018 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 17:48, aplat= onov : > > It should be noticed that additional parameter TEST_SCALE_FACTOR was adde= d. > This parameter with ScaleFactorUtil methods can be used for test size > scaling for different runs (like ordinary and nightly RunALLs). If someon= e > want to distinguish these builds he/she can apply scaling methods from > ScaleFactorUtil in own tests. For nightly test TEST_SCALE_FACTOR=3D1.0, f= or > non-nightly builds TEST_SCALE_FACTOR<1.0. For example in > GridAbstractCacheInterceptorRebalanceTest test ScaleFactorUtil was used f= or > scaling count of iterations. I guess that TEST_SCALE_FACTOR support will = be > added to runs at the same time with RunALL (nightly) runs. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ --=20 Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin