ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Павлухин Иван <vololo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Abbreviation code-style requirement.
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:05:14 GMT
Hi all,

I also think that abbreviations should not be mandatory (point 3).
But what I am worrying about is a conflict resolution between a patch
submitter and a reviewer.
How to come to an agreement when one side is strictly for and another side
is strictly against
using abbreviations in some concrete case?

вс, 21 окт. 2018 г. в 11:34, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>:

> +1 for proposal 3.
> 1. I'm not sure we need to revisit all abbreviations as a lot of people get
> used to it.
> 2. I'm not sure multiword is always need to be fully named, sometimes it
> may be ok to abbreviate.
> 3. But I agree with abbreviations should not be mandatory.
> Abbreviated and short names like i,j,cp and etc. are good for simple
> methods and code blocks; for a fast demonstration of some idea, but for
> complex enterprise level software it can hide meaning instead of clearly
> showing it.
> As a next step, I would like to propose to contribute an option to disable
> abbreviation requirements for some cases in ignite-abbrev-plugin.
> сб, 20 окт. 2018 г. в 10:47, Zhenya <arzamas123@mail.ru.invalid>:
> > +1 for all proposals.
> >

Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message