ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Removing "fabric" from Ignite binary package name
Date Wed, 01 Aug 2018 19:46:01 GMT
My concern here is exactly about internal build processes — removing fabric from the name of binary archive (with any way) will break lots of them.
There will be no sacrifices, just lots of work for fixing build processes (where we won’t be able to introduce changes proactively).

Therefore only fabric removal implementation (quick with some legacy left or full refactoring) is on the agenda.
And this matter should be jugged by the community: currently we have (if our voices are equal) 1:1 with Anton about it.




> On 1 Aug 2018, at 22:28, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Let's focus on what is important here. Our users do not care about our
> internal build process.If we could remove the word fabric from the next
> release without any significant sacrifices in the build process or making
> it less maintainable, I suggest we do it.
> 
> D.
> 
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Petr Ivanov <mr.weider@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Simple way with some hack and legacy maintenance: accept patch as it is
>> implemented now.
>> Hard way: full assembly refactoring and hadoop rejection.
>> 
>> Anyway, after this is merged to master — complete automation systems
>> revision (TeamCity for example) is required due to heavy hardcode of
>> “fabric” in such systems.
>> 
>> 
>>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 21:55, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK, so what is the plan? How do we get rid of the fabric name?
>>> 
>>> D.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:21 AM, Anton Vinogradov <av@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Since you proposing patch to the community, you are the very man :)
>>>> 
>>>> ср, 1 авг. 2018 г. в 12:16, Petr Ivanov <mr.weider@gmail.com>:
>>>> 
>>>>> You are convincing the wrong person.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 12:05, Anton Vinogradov <av@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Peter,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We had a discussion about how to do this properly.
>>>>>> Proposed solution cannot be merged, since it makes code harder than it
>>>>> was.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The only case is to perform complete refactoring and get rid of all
>>>>>> postfixes and other weird stuff.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For example
>>>>>> - <ignite.zip.pattern>
>>>>>> - <ignite.edition>
>>>>>> should be definetely removed from code.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ср, 1 авг. 2018 г. в 9:39, Peter Ivanov <mr.weider@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The task was ready long ago, but community failed to review and merge
>>>> it
>>>>>>> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>>>>>> Not being a committer, my capabilities of introducing such changes
>> are
>>>>>>> limited.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I will update code during this week and will pass for review once
>>>> again.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 00:24, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
>> dsetrakyan@apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Yes, agree, fabric has to be removed. If it is done in 2.7, would be
>>>>>>> great!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Peter, folks,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It's weird, but we have been failing to introduce this minor change
>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>> December. Can we get it done for 2.7 that is being discussed at the
>>>>>>>> moment?
>>>>>>>>> Are there any technical issues that block you from merging the
>>>>> changes?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:03 PM Peter Ivanov <mr.weider@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Ok, then I will update issue code and start preparation for build
>>>>>>>>>> configuration changes.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 at 23:41, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> With which one — current implementation in issue?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> That's the answer to your question:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. quickly fix all of them (can be solved by preliminary
>>>>>>>> preparations —
>>>>>>>>>>> searching for -fabric- usages in build configuration);
>>>>>>>>>>>  2. update all branches to master because otherwise old branch
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> stop
>>>>>>>>>>> building.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Petr Ivanov <mr.weider@gmail.com
>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 23:04, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with the suggested approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> With which one — current implementation in issue?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, not sure we need to update
>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the branches. Can't branch owners just pull the changes
>>>>>>> back
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> master if the plan to merge back later?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, we as an initiative group of this issue should do
>>>>>>>> nothing,
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> will lie on shoulders of developers.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Petr Ivanov <
>>>>>>>> mr.weider@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The most simple approach — repack and rearchive binary archive
>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release build, however that would not resolve the problem
>>>>>>>> globally
>>>>>>>>>>> (and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will require fixing every build configuration we have on
>>>>>>>>> TeamCity).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current approach implemented in task — creates already correct
>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary archive name, but old name (with -fabric-) is used in
>>>>>>>>> almost
>>>>>>>>>>>> every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build configuration too and merge code to master will require
>>>>>>>> to:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. quickly fix all of them (can be solved by preliminary
>>>>>>>>>>> preparations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — searching for -fabric- usages in build configuration);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. update all branches to master because otherwise old
>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop building.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 22:42, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for pulling up the conversation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I still prefer us not to complicate the things and just
>>>>>>> remove
>>>>>>>>>>> "fabric"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the *package name*. Use the easiest way possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I don't care about Hadoop and would not suggest
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasting its time on it. So, just rename the suffixes/prefixes
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files the way you like to address Anton's concerns.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Petr Ivanov <
>>>>>>>> mr.weider@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets define once again what should be done in this [1] task?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If current implementation is good, than I’ll update it to
>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for review.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet, there is other part of the task which concerns our
>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>> — I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that almost all our build configurations will fail
>>>>>>> due
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change and there is no simple way of updating configurations
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge task to master and start fixing failing builds.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Feb 2018, at 01:56, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we necessarily need to remove 'fabric' word
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the project, we just need to rename the name of
>>>>>>>>> downloadable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Couldn’t say it better than you, Val. Thanks for pitching
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly what the ticket is about.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we necessarily need to remove 'fabric' word
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the project, we just need to rename the name of
>>>>>>>>> downloadable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package. Is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there any other place where 'fabric' is exposed to the
>>>>>>> user?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that's the case, it should not be a big change, no?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Val
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogradov@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're proposing changes without viewing a code :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What’s wrong if we just go ahead and:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - replace “fabric” with “ignite”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - replace “hadoop” with “ignite-hadoop"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:51 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogradov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop" and "fabric" words work on same engine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have special assembly desctiptors, for example:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-fabric.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-fabric-lgpl.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-hadoop.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-base.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric-base.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric-lgpl.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-hadoop.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'ts impossible for now to remove "fabric" without
>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only one case is to make some ditry hack, but that's
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Sergey Kozlov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skozlov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 hadoop accelerator removing for AI 2.5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also probably IGFS should be either removed or
>>>>>>>> refactored,
>>>>>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directly over the data region without using "cache"
>>>>>>>> entity
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intermidiate stage
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don’t get how the hadoop editions are related to
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> task.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not named as “data fabric” for a while. Check up
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> site
>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> docs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The “fabric” word is being removed from all over the
>>>>>>>>> places
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be removed from the editions’ names.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the hadoop future, my personal position is to
>>>>>>>>> retire
>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> component
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and forget about it. I would restart the conversation
>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 2.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2018, at 2:13 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
>>>>>>>>>> av@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, Petr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I checked PR and found we have *overcomplicated*
>>>>>>> logic
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "fabric"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop" postfixs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we really need to assembly 2 editions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hadoop" edition still valued?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My proposal is to get rid of "hadoop" edition and
>>>>>>>>> replace
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction of how to use "fabric" edition instead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instruction will be pretty easy -> move "hadoop"
>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "optional"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> root directory :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we can just remove all postfix logic
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>> maven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poms
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simplify release process.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks for solving it!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that Anton V. or some other build master will
>>>>>>>>>>>> double-check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes and merge them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Petr Ivanov <
>>>>>>>>>>>> mr.weider@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7251 is done, needs review and some
>>>>>>>> additional
>>>>>>>>>>> tests.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3315 [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Dec 2017, at 23:15, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks, such a swift turnaround!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you found the one who can asses and review
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> changes?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maintainers label might be helpful. Just ping
>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>> directly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>> confluence/display/IGNITE/How+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:24 AM, Petr Ivanov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mr.weider@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assigned myself — done the same work while
>>>>>>>> preparing
>>>>>>>>>> RPM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But for fixing DEVNOTES.txt waiting for review
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7107 [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-7107
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Dec 2017, at 22:55, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the bids were accepted and the verdict is
>>>>>>>>>> executed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251
>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is ready to pick this up?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:35 AM, Anton Vinogradov
>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogradov@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1б фо шур
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Vladimir
>>>>>>>> Ozerov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1б вуаштшеудн
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Valentin
>>>>>>>>>> Kulichenko
>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Dmitriy
>>>>>>>>>> Setrakyan
>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dsetrakyan@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (completely agree)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Denis
>>>>>>>> Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite binary releases still
>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>> “fabric”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> word
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> names:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>> download.cgi#binaries
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>> download.cgi#binaries
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, this is a full name of the
>>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-ignite-fabric-2.3.0-bin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s a little oversight on our side
>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> positioned as a fabric for a while.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposal! Remove “fabric” from the name
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as - apache-ignite-{version}-bin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we’re in consensus then let’s make the
>>>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message