From dev-return-35437-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@ignite.apache.org Fri Jun 8 07:03:24 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 4370D180608 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:03:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 32783 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2018 05:03:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 32771 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2018 05:03:21 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 05:03:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F3ED21808D1 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 05:03:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UF2WBqCep8G4 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 05:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com (mail-oi0-f68.google.com [209.85.218.68]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 90D095F57F for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 05:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f68.google.com with SMTP id c128-v6so10720225oig.11 for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 22:03:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Wa48dCxDP2SsQwTBCUJtVhHK70C2J4gpKKwEu6OSNUk=; b=ax10R45Ceob4qh7HOWT15TiCZ9V0SF2c8Ic9xW4kjyR+rYfGlZc2BVgzGqRIQC8/pS ig42OoF738S03adjQG2gkicBKvuLcDy+5ZnZWtlzixlLWR/+0hXYVHlGX9ffJrFnzL93 dzchQ39Aqn24JT+hPVDaaAfgXdH/XmiQvlTDdboGTLIsbEcfE5QQFvXVfCFJ4m818DWI 87ObFYi3DGMT+NJyMxGazoEnC3E5UeYCJisb/+SHz4sBqp0VOcA3h9r4O12o23S4e7b7 674A0z1/W7Hl5TpeIbodWJbrZiVI7juMxc84M27OkgseI3bTkHfM+ub2V7fA0By7rUy6 +V3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Wa48dCxDP2SsQwTBCUJtVhHK70C2J4gpKKwEu6OSNUk=; b=rTDrMiCdtUEJLG/cfd1yFqSGbPaTQifC8LJ+GdgbIT5JNh/De6RPg0NC+bVooxMEaf GE+k2YVdhdn9wmKXPJ9Ia+TqKN/o1chaKGR4o1YlAk8RjOF2HlZWSTPGu+0UxUUMfHy1 NsxDpuFQV15xC7mZ1mu6nUg9nb3JX5Xyp1yl1nDqNV2Oil5MLlkm8uzY6/PI1TfAcx/U Rf5dGO49k6d1hM9KsKa+ohGmkvTi6IDE/XENfnTjH36oVb1EI8pw/hpLbZHv+G9fv/HF +/DvApzVFhXE5YReLJ00nleaF65EOw5RjlkCKFcFBf555WiUXM34I6tRxhYld+YopOjV o41A== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E10+tS0zWiOCkgumkbOsfMdIoIzzgfhc9OGOU3f2vyrjbNcKSq4 Nh8pnt/cnbQC2//75nuVga1w/WookAn/dZPQFU0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIsFpSmWzcBGrM/XegAS0xb6c4Jsu7vV6yIeDxM60KzTBxfh7q/dV9Ib8oOqawlicrhfYRrtFhxyZvIbm5O/vs= X-Received: by 2002:aca:3e83:: with SMTP id l125-v6mr2578851oia.64.1528434192714; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 22:03:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <27BCAEEB-2C52-431A-AFB6-AE0633EFC02C@gmail.com> <59E36BC0-F121-48D6-A06E-B1CAC13F023A@apache.org> <0F69DCE2-CFB9-43A7-B8DB-87E3B2D06384@apache.org> <4A699E4E-04D5-4ED2-BDF4-E2237E9B060A@gmail.com> <6A2741A3-81B9-48DC-95FF-A5D85C543588@gmail.com> <6F5262E4-8F4A-4C2C-B8E7-F49649A8A1B1@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Peter Ivanov Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 08:03:01 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Removing "fabric" from Ignite binary package name To: dev@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001e906d056e1a511e" --0000000000001e906d056e1a511e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok, then I will update issue code and start preparation for build configuration changes. On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 at 23:41, Denis Magda wrote: > > > > With which one =E2=80=94 current implementation in issue? > > > That's the answer to your question: > > 1. quickly fix all of them (can be solved by preliminary preparations =E2= =80=94 > searching for -fabric- usages in build configuration); > 2. update all branches to master because otherwise old branch will st= op > building. > > > -- > Denis > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Petr Ivanov wrote: > > > > > > On 7 Jun 2018, at 23:04, Denis Magda wrote: > > > > > > I'm fine with the suggested approach. > > > > With which one =E2=80=94 current implementation in issue? > > > > > > > However, not sure we need to update > > > all the branches. Can't branch owners just pull the changes back from > > > master if the plan to merge back later? > > > > Of course, we as an initiative group of this issue should do nothing, i= t > > will lie on shoulders of developers. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Denis > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Petr Ivanov > > wrote: > > > > > >> Denis, > > >> > > >> > > >> The most simple approach =E2=80=94 repack and rearchive binary archi= ve after > > >> release build, however that would not resolve the problem globally > (and > > >> will require fixing every build configuration we have on TeamCity). > > >> Current approach implemented in task =E2=80=94 creates already corre= ct folder > > and > > >> binary archive name, but old name (with -fabric-) is used in almost > > every > > >> build configuration too and merge code to master will require to: > > >> 1. quickly fix all of them (can be solved by preliminary > preparations > > >> =E2=80=94 searching for -fabric- usages in build configuration); > > >> 2. update all branches to master because otherwise old branch wil= l > > >> stop building. > > >> > > >> WDYT? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 22:42, Denis Magda wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Petr, > > >>> > > >>> Thanks for pulling up the conversation. > > >>> > > >>> I still prefer us not to complicate the things and just remove > "fabric" > > >>> from the *package name*. Use the easiest way possible. > > >>> > > >>> Personally, I don't care about Hadoop and would not suggest the > > community > > >>> wasting its time on it. So, just rename the suffixes/prefixes of th= e > > >> build > > >>> files the way you like to address Anton's concerns. > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Denis > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Petr Ivanov > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Igniters, > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Lets define once again what should be done in this [1] task? > > >>>> If current implementation is good, than I=E2=80=99ll update it to = master and > > >> pass > > >>>> for review. > > >>>> > > >>>> Yet, there is other part of the task which concerns our build serv= er > > =E2=80=94 I > > >>>> assume that almost all our build configurations will fail due to > name > > >>>> change and there is no simple way of updating configurations other > > then > > >>>> merge task to master and start fixing failing builds. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251 > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> On 10 Feb 2018, at 01:56, Denis Magda wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I don't think we necessarily need to remove 'fabric' word from > every > > >>>> file > > >>>>>> in the project, we just need to rename the name of downloadable > > >> package. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Couldn=E2=80=99t say it better than you, Val. Thanks for pitching= in :) > This > > is > > >>>> exactly what the ticket is about. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> =E2=80=94 > > >>>>> Denis > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > >>>> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Anton, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I don't think we necessarily need to remove 'fabric' word from > every > > >>>> file > > >>>>>> in the project, we just need to rename the name of downloadable > > >>>> package. Is > > >>>>>> there any other place where 'fabric' is exposed to the user? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> If that's the case, it should not be a big change, no? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -Val > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > > >>>> avinogradov@gridgain.com> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> You're proposing changes without viewing a code :) > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Denis Magda > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Anton, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> What=E2=80=99s wrong if we just go ahead and: > > >>>>>>>> - replace =E2=80=9Cfabric=E2=80=9D with =E2=80=9Cignite=E2=80= =9D > > >>>>>>>> - replace =E2=80=9Chadoop=E2=80=9D with =E2=80=9Cignite-hadoop= " > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 > > >>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:51 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > > >>>> avinogradov@gridgain.com > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> "hadoop" and "fabric" words work on same engine. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> We have special assembly desctiptors, for example: > > >>>>>>>>> dependencies-fabric.xml > > >>>>>>>>> dependencies-fabric-lgpl.xml > > >>>>>>>>> dependencies-hadoop.xml > > >>>>>>>>> release-base.xml > > >>>>>>>>> release-fabric.xml > > >>>>>>>>> release-fabric-base.xml > > >>>>>>>>> release-fabric-lgpl.xml > > >>>>>>>>> release-hadoop.xml > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> So, I'ts impossible for now to remove "fabric" without "hadoo= p" > > >>>>>>> removal. > > >>>>>>>>> Only one case is to make some ditry hack, but that's not a go= od > > >> idea. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Sergey Kozlov < > > >> skozlov@gridgain.com > > >>>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 hadoop accelerator removing for AI 2.5 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Also probably IGFS should be either removed or refactored, > e.g. > > >>>> create > > >>>>>>>> FS > > >>>>>>>>>> directly over the data region without using "cache" entity a= s > an > > >>>>>>>>>> intermidiate stage > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Denis Magda < > dmagda@apache.org> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Anton, > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I don=E2=80=99t get how the hadoop editions are related to = this task. > > The > > >>>>>>>> project > > >>>>>>>>>>> is not named as =E2=80=9Cdata fabric=E2=80=9D for a while. = Check up the site > or > > >>>> docs. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> The =E2=80=9Cfabric=E2=80=9D word is being removed from all= over the places > and > > >>>> needs > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>> be removed from the editions=E2=80=99 names. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> As for the hadoop future, my personal position is to retire > > this > > >>>>>>>>>> component > > >>>>>>>>>>> and forget about it. I would restart the conversation again > > after > > >>>> we > > >>>>>>>> done > > >>>>>>>>>>> with 2.4. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 > > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2018, at 2:13 AM, Anton Vinogradov > > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, Petr, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I checked PR and found we have *overcomplicated* logic wit= h > > >>>> "fabric" > > >>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop" postfixs. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Do we really need to assembly 2 editions? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Hadoop" edition still valued? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> My proposal is to get rid of "hadoop" edition and replace = it > > >> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>> instruction of how to use "fabric" edition instead. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Instruction will be pretty easy -> move "hadoop" folder fr= om > > >>>>>>>> "optional" > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>> root directory :) > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we can just remove all postfix logic from mav= en > > >> poms > > >>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>> simplify release process. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Denis Magda < > > dmagda@apache.org > > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks for solving it! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that Anton V. or some other build master will > > double-check > > >>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> changes and merge them. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Petr Ivanov < > > mr.weider@gmail.com > > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7251 is done, needs review and some additional > tests. > > >> See > > >>>>>>> PR > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> #3315 [1]. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315 < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Dec 2017, at 23:15, Denis Magda > > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks, such a swift turnaround! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you found the one who can asses and review the > > changes? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maintainers label might be helpful. Just ping them > > directly: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers= < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers= > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:24 AM, Petr Ivanov < > > >>>> mr.weider@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assigned myself =E2=80=94 done the same work while pre= paring RPM > > >>>>>>> package. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But for fixing DEVNOTES.txt waiting for review and mer= ge > > of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7107 [1]. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7107 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Dec 2017, at 22:55, Denis Magda < > dmagda@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the bids were accepted and the verdict is execute= d: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251 < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is ready to pick this up? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:35 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogradov@gridgain.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1=D0=B1 =D1=84=D0=BE =D1=88=D1=83=D1=80 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Vladimir Ozerov < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1=D0=B1 =D0=B2=D1=83=D0=B0=D1=88=D1=82=D1=88=D0=B5= =D1=83=D0=B4=D0=BD > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Valentin Kulichenk= o > < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Dmitriy Setrakya= n > < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dsetrakyan@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (completely agree) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite binary releases still include > =E2=80=9Cfabric=E2=80=9D > > >>>> word > > >>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> their > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> names: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#binaries = < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#binaries> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, this is a full name of the previou= s > > >>>> release > > >>>>>>> - > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-ignite-fabric-2.3.0-bin. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It=E2=80=99s a little oversight on our side beca= use the > > >> project > > >>>>>>> has > > >>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> been > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> positioned as a fabric for a while. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposal! Remove =E2=80=9Cfabric=E2=80=9D from t= he name and have > the > > >>>>>>> binary > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> releases > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as - apache-ignite-{version}-bin. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we=E2=80=99re in consensus then let=E2=80=99s= make the change > in > > >> 2.4. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov > > >>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems > > >>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > --0000000000001e906d056e1a511e--