ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: IGNITE-6879
Date Tue, 08 May 2018 12:55:10 GMT
Hi Roman,

now TC passes for 1.0. In the same time new suite is not executed on TC.

I've asked Peter Ivanov to assist in TC run set up for Spring Data 2.0.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

пн, 7 мая 2018 г. в 18:23, Роман Меерсон <homich1991@gmail.com>:

> Dmitry, I leave comment at issue. As i may see localy problem with tests
> was fixed
>
> пн, 7 мая 2018 г. в 17:24, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi, I've replied to ticket, seems old tests are now failing after
>> applying patch locally.
>>
>> I've also added 2 suites to TC
>> TEST_SUITE =IgniteSpringDataTestSuite,IgniteSpringData2TestSuite
>> to
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_SpringData
>>
>> so this suite will check both integrations. Ideally we could run this
>> suite one more time before merge.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Dmitriy Pavlov
>>
>> пн, 7 мая 2018 г. в 15:46, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Roman,
>>>
>>> Currently I'm checking the changes. Because of applying idea to copy all
>>> changes and upsource problem with this branch it is quite complex to locate
>>> actual changes. It is now required to check all copied files before merge.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
>>>
>>> пн, 7 мая 2018 г. в 11:07, Роман Меерсон <homich1991@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hello Dmitry!
>>>>
>>>> was review successfull? Or there are any points to change?
>>>>
>>>> сб, 28 апр. 2018 г. в 19:32, Роман Меерсон <homich1991@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Ok! I believe in community and that things would change!
>>>>> Looking forward for news
>>>>> сб, 28 апр. 2018 г. в 19:29, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope so!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There was several posts related to review time, and AI community
is
>>>>>> now trying to reduce it. Now it is about 70 tickets waiting to be
merged
>>>>>> more than 1month. This defenetely should be changed. And I hope all
Ignite
>>>>>> committers and maintainters would continue to assist in this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> сб, 28 апр. 2018 г. в 18:24, Роман Меерсон <homich1991@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Soon we'll celebrate 2 months of my PR :)
>>>>>>> Maybe it could be merged?
>>>>>>> пн, 23 апр. 2018 г. в 18:52, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, nothing yet. I'm going to look to new version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> пн, 23 апр. 2018 г. в 17:43, Роман Меерсон
<homich1991@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are there any news about PR merging?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> пн, 16 апр. 2018 г. в 19:43, Роман Меерсон
<homich1991@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> module naming fixed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> пн, 16 апр. 2018 г. в 19:24, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In my last reply, I voted for your approach -
using
>>>>>>>>>>> "spring-data*_*2.0" for
>>>>>>>>>>> the new Spring version. However, please note
that we use "_"
>>>>>>>>>>> symbol instead
>>>>>>>>>>> of "-" to separate a version from the package
name.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Роман Меерсон
<
>>>>>>>>>>> homich1991@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi all!
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > So guys let’s make a decision. We leave
code in current state
>>>>>>>>>>> as I suggest
>>>>>>>>>>> > or change module naming according Dmitry’s
suggestion.
>>>>>>>>>>> > ср, 11 апр. 2018 г. в 1:54, Denis
Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > Your suggestion sounds reasonable to
me. Backing it up.
>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > --
>>>>>>>>>>> > > Denis
>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Роман
Меерсон <
>>>>>>>>>>> homich1991@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > Hi all!
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > IMHO if we do so we'll produce
big pain for everybody
>>>>>>>>>>> while migrating
>>>>>>>>>>> > on
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > new version, because ones should
change method and others
>>>>>>>>>>> should change
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > their poms. This change would
be backward incompatible so
>>>>>>>>>>> it probably
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > should follow with major version
upgrade, but I'm not sure
>>>>>>>>>>> about it.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > Otherwise if we leave current
state( spring-data for old
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > spring-data-2.0 for new) we could
support old users who
>>>>>>>>>>> probably use
>>>>>>>>>>> > > spring
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > data 1.0 (because spring data
2.0 release was not so long
>>>>>>>>>>> ago) and
>>>>>>>>>>> > > provide
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > new functionality for users who
want to use new spring
>>>>>>>>>>> data.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > In this case old users wouldn't
change any in their code
>>>>>>>>>>> except ignite
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > version, and new users would include
ignite in their Pom
>>>>>>>>>>> anyway and
>>>>>>>>>>> > could
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > choose which module of spring
data to bring.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > After some time (probably on 3.0
release) we could change
>>>>>>>>>>> naming as
>>>>>>>>>>> > Denis
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > suggested.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > Anyway I leave this decision up
to you, just tell me what
>>>>>>>>>>> is the way to
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > finish this PR.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > Regards, Roman.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > ср, 11 апр. 2018 г. в 1:35,
Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > In our Hibernate integration
we define following two
>>>>>>>>>>> modules to
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > distinguish incompatible
versions:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >    - ignite-hiberbate_4.2
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >    - ignite-hibernate_5.1
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > In Spark we have:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >    - ignite-spark
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >    - ignite-spark_2.10
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > After thinking this over,
I would do the following with
>>>>>>>>>>> Spring Data:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >    - ignite-spring-data for
the latest Sprind Data 2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >    - ignite-spring-data_1.0
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > --
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Denis
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:50
AM, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>>>>>>>>>> > dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> Thank you, Roman.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> IMO we should consider
one more alternative - renaming
>>>>>>>>>>> of old module
>>>>>>>>>>> > > and
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> package names. Users,
which prefer to stay on previous
>>>>>>>>>>> version will
>>>>>>>>>>> > be
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> requiered to update their
pom's. In the same time users
>>>>>>>>>>> which are
>>>>>>>>>>> > > ready
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > to
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> migrate to spring data
2.0 will need to update methods
>>>>>>>>>>> naming.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> Denis M, what would you
say?
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> Dmitriy Pavlov
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> вт, 10 апр. 2018
г. в 11:27, Роман Меерсон <
>>>>>>>>>>> homich1991@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> Hi Dmitry!
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> I`ve just commited
new fix. I renamed package of new
>>>>>>>>>>> module to
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> springdata20, it
helps us to separate old
>>>>>>>>>>> implementation from new
>>>>>>>>>>> > and
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > also
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> should fix all compilation
errors.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> пн, 9 апр. 2018
г. в 23:54, Роман Меерсон <
>>>>>>>>>>> homich1991@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>> Ok, I'll check
it, but I haven't face this problem.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>> If I'll find
same issue, what is the proper way?
>>>>>>>>>>> Renaming to
>>>>>>>>>>> > > something
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>> like Ignite2QueryGenerator
or module removing?
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>> пн, 9 апр.
2018 г. в 23:40, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>>>>>>>>>> dpavlov.spb@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> > >:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>> There are
2 classes IgniteQueryGenerator with same
>>>>>>>>>>> package name.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>> Ignite in
Idea can't compile.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>> пн, 9 апр.
2018 г., 21:38 Роман Меерсон <
>>>>>>>>>>> homich1991@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi Dmitry!
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Could
you specify where you find conflict? Because
>>>>>>>>>>> I don’t have
>>>>>>>>>>> > > any.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> пн,
9 апр. 2018 г. в 21:09, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>>>>>>>>>> > dpavlov.spb@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi
Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> could
we support just one version instead of
>>>>>>>>>>> leaving compatible
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> module?
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Dmitriy
Pavlov
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> пн,
9 апр. 2018 г. в 20:08, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>>>>>>>>>> > dpavlov.spb@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 20:07, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>>>>>>>>>> > > dpavlov.spb@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
Hi Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
I've applied PR locally and I have class name
>>>>>>>>>>> conflict at
>>>>>>>>>>> > least
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
for
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
org.apache.ignite.springdata.repository.query.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > IgniteQueryGenerator
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
How could we solve it? Is it better to rename
>>>>>>>>>>> class for new
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > plugin
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
version?
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
Dmitriy Pavlov
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 17:38, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>>>>>>>>>> > > dpavlov.spb@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
Excellend picture. I remember about this change.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
If Denis M. would be able to look througt the
>>>>>>>>>>> changes faster
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > than
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
me, I can merge without detailed review.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 16:15, Роман Меерсон <
>>>>>>>>>>> > > homich1991@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
OK
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
[image: 1486924635147168240.jpg]
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 17:08, Igor Sapego <
>>>>>>>>>>> > isapego@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
Well, Dmitry has said he's going to merge it
>>>>>>>>>>> in 3-4 days 2
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > days
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
ago,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
so I guess, the merge is going to happen in
>>>>>>>>>>> 1-2 days or
>>>>>>>>>>> > so.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
Igor
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Роман Меерсон
>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
homich1991@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> Hi all!
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> As i see everything is awesome and there is
>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>> > objections,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > so
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
when my PR
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> would be merged?
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 18:58, Вячеслав
>>>>>>>>>>> Коптилин <
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
slava.koptilin@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > Thank you, Roman!
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > 2018-04-05 17:49 GMT+03:00 Роман Меерсон <
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
homich1991@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > Hi Slava,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > Fixed
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 18:41, Вячеслав
>>>>>>>>>>> Коптилин <
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> slava.koptilin@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > Hi Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > please take into account my comment
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
IgniteQueryGenerator.java
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > <
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
https://reviews.ignite.apache.
>>>>>>>>>>> > org/ignite/review/IGNT-CR-541
>>>>>>>>>>> > > ?
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > commentId=de43c65f-9ac7-4080-
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > 9904-aec119138c94&filePath=/
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > modules/spring-data-2.0/src/
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > main/java/org/apache/ignite/
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > springdata/repository/query/
>>>>>>>>>>> > IgniteQueryGenerator.java
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > Slava.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > 2018-04-05 14:59 GMT+03:00 Роман
>>>>>>>>>>> Меерсон <
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
homich1991@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > Ok, so waiting for accept and commit
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 15:29, Alexey
>>>>>>>>>>> Kukushkin <
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > kukushkinalexey@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >:
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > Just pay commiter's (Dmitry
>>>>>>>>>>> Pavlov will most
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > likely
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
commit your
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > code)
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > attention to include the new test
>>>>>>>>>>> suite to
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > TeamCity
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> configuration.
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message