ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Thin clients features wiki page
Date Wed, 16 May 2018 08:26:08 GMT
Pavel,

This is about concurrent usage of the same connection (client)
by several threads.

By the ways guys, I wanted to ask you, if your clients support this
feature, as I was not sure. I mean, protocol seems to be designed
to support such use-case, but I was not sure about clients.

Best Regards,
Igor

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupitsyn@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi Igor,
>
> Thanks for creating this!
> One question: what is `Multithreading` feature?
>
> Pavel
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
> > Igor,
> >
> > That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new documentation
> > engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within 2.6.
> > Just need to find more contributors who would help with this.
> >
> > --
> > Denis
> >
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Igor Sapego <isapego@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this.
> > >
> > > Denis,
> > > Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look OK,
> > > while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more clients
> > > (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a one
> > > more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Igor
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Igor, thanks for putting together the page.
> > >>
> > >> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's
> suggestions.
> > >>
> > >> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that once
> > it's
> > >> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Denis
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
> > >> alexey.kosenchuk@nobitlost.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Igor,
> > >>>
> > >>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a
> > >>> "binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
> > >>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not
> > >>> specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
> > >>>
> > >>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
> > >>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
> > >>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > >>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and
> write.
> > >>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> -Alexey
> > >>>
> > >>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hello Igniters,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
> > >>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development
> > >>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state
> > >>>> of clients.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
> > >>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] -
> > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clie
> > >>>> nts+features
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>> Igor
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message