ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guru Stron <gurustronpub...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Thin clients features wiki page
Date Wed, 16 May 2018 09:34:53 GMT
 Hi Igor,

Nice one!

On 16 May 2018 at 11:26, Igor Sapego <isapego@apache.org> wrote:

> Pavel,
>
> This is about concurrent usage of the same connection (client)
> by several threads.
>
> By the ways guys, I wanted to ask you, if your clients support this
> feature, as I was not sure. I mean, protocol seems to be designed
> to support such use-case, but I was not sure about clients.
>
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupitsyn@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > Thanks for creating this!
> > One question: what is `Multithreading` feature?
> >
> > Pavel
> >
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Igor,
> > >
> > > That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new
> documentation
> > > engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within 2.6.
> > > Just need to find more contributors who would help with this.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Denis
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Igor Sapego <isapego@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this.
> > > >
> > > > Denis,
> > > > Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look OK,
> > > > while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more clients
> > > > (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a one
> > > > more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Igor
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Igor, thanks for putting together the page.
> > > >>
> > > >> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's
> > suggestions.
> > > >>
> > > >> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that once
> > > it's
> > > >> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Denis
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
> > > >> alexey.kosenchuk@nobitlost.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Igor,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in
a
> > > >>> "binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
> > > >>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not
> > > >>> specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
> > > >>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
> > > >>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > > >>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and
> > write.
> > > >>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> -Alexey
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hello Igniters,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
> > > >>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan
> development
> > > >>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand
a state
> > > >>>> of clients.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are
some
> > > >>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1] -
> > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clie
> > > >>>> nts+features
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best Regards,
> > > >>>> Igor
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message