From dev-return-33089-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@ignite.apache.org  Mon Apr  9 15:02:00 2018
Return-Path: <dev-return-33089-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@ignite.apache.org>
X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8719B180645
	for <archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io>; Mon,  9 Apr 2018 15:01:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 40542 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2018 13:01:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@ignite.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ignite.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@ignite.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.ignite.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org
Received: (qmail 40531 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2018 13:01:58 -0000
Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) (207.244.88.137)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 13:01:58 +0000
Received: from mail-ot0-f182.google.com (mail-ot0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182])
	by mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 945221D1D
	for <dev@ignite.apache.org>; Mon,  9 Apr 2018 13:01:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ot0-f182.google.com with SMTP id j8-v6so8453193ota.7
        for <dev@ignite.apache.org>; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 06:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDZaf2+9nRkkEraPNpyf9J9NZ4KBGRX3bt2ngWEfTPG5qNcsYHW
	IDx6EoAzeX5AQAPnVnv5Kxvkf3JLLLt3mkIPpsWuZg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/KctBScGceY4TQIbQkfXEZKfmgZTasvwhhVxHr0mUo+D1ZfIjSIQaTLCjAfp2lH5GsA3x8k/V1rASQTmuGM2U=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:481a:: with SMTP id c26-v6mr23863789otf.393.1523278916394;
 Mon, 09 Apr 2018 06:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.201.118.131 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 06:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABDss3gCYvK1Tf96803Jw_PHRHKcbfEFursgdm1bLL-2+HtCsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMegbc+N=aQsnfs0TFYgdLb5BTH0E7f-GOZx4=1A-Xq5iUvXPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALUCNEv1rQPQ6ooGf9QUV4Pv-o2F0FbqWhfvggS3+VgNgGyPKA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFd0bftc9GV23KDpEafZhu83egw8r8zARcRR9MTgG1K-YUWB3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABDss3h13_T6q5=FJLeU=UmpUaMmA6nPQG2u2mANe5nj=CTpHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+0=VoVwz53YmqmTW4GV9gtEW2etUmDZ7nzS-W3a1DfNnJ0wTQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK1mX7H6QhAAxpcJke2FJvL_eLTMaWreCyVxw9xJjUH_Suubtg@mail.gmail.com> <CABDss3gCYvK1Tf96803Jw_PHRHKcbfEFursgdm1bLL-2+HtCsQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 06:01:15 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CA+0=VoW73JBqha5BPGccOLQka6rt3DSpMrXDZO5vD0Y-pYQfqA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+0=VoW73JBqha5BPGccOLQka6rt3DSpMrXDZO5vD0Y-pYQfqA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IGNITE-6827 - Review needed.
To: dev <dev@ignite.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b4bfa605696a0288"

--000000000000b4bfa605696a0288
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 5:42 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Guys,
>
> After the review in Upsource the configuration parameter was renamed
> to txTimeoutOnPartMapSync, and it makes sense to me because PME is an
> implementation detail and it may change in future, partition map sync is a
> more abstract term. For the same reason I like this parameter being placed
> on transactions configuration - we do not have any parameters for PME, so
> the configuration property goes to an object which affects a user-exposed
> API.
>

AG, are we going to have any other timeouts on PME, like locks? If yes,
then I would still vote of adding PmeTimeout property.

--000000000000b4bfa605696a0288--