ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 2.4 release
Date Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:49:27 GMT
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 6:26 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>

> I had idea to name old default as FSYNC, but it would be too scientific.

I like FSYNC, I do not think it is too scientific. Definitely not more
scientific than LOG_ONLY.

For old DEFAULT, STRICT or STRICT_SYNC - IMO are best options, so I agree
> with Ivan.

Not sure I like STRICT. In Linux world, fsync is a well known command which
does exactly what our FSYNC mode will do:
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/fsync.2.html . STRICT, on the other
hand, is not a commonly understood term. Why create a new term to define
something that has already been defined?

Also, what if tomorrow we need to add an even stricter parameter? Then we
are back to the same problem we are trying to fix right now.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message