ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: FOR UPDATE support in SELECT clause
Date Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:58:48 GMT
In this case you lock rows, but there are not subsequent operation which
will use this lock. FOR UPDATE only makes sense as a part of transaction.

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I do not see any use case for this. Why would you want to do this?
> >
>
> Atomic cache supports locking to my knowledge. The use case would be
> identical in SQL use case - to lock a row. Why not?
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message