Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org
From: Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Geo-spatial and full-text indexes support in Ignite 2.x
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 10:09:37 -0700
References: <CAGt6o8nM4mGMeH7FpinQXqgTqSqUOxdzF-t2PMtVTWneLnS6Wg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@ignite.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <CAGt6o8nM4mGMeH7FpinQXqgTqSqUOxdzF-t2PMtVTWneLnS6Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <4DF7BF01-6311-4173-AA3F-A4E32AE6D454@apache.org>
archived-at: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:09:43 -0000

Vladimir,

We need to consider that these two types of indexes are not stored =
off-heap either.=20

It expands the task a bit =E2=80=94 the indexes have to be fully =
integrated with the new durable memory architecture supporting both =
off-heap and persistence layers.

=E2=80=94
Denis

> On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:26 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> Guys,
>=20
> AFAIK these two index types are not supported with enabled persistence =
at
> the moment, neither they stored on the disk anyhow. Can someone help =
with
> estimates on how difficult would it be to implement these indexes over
> page-memory architecture?
>=20
> Looks like we will have to write our own implementation of these =
indexes,
> instead of relying on Lucene and H2. Am I right?
>=20
> Vladimir.