Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D19200CA4 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 13:38:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 505F8160BD0; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id BDF89160BB6 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 13:38:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 72868 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2017 11:38:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 72855 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2017 11:38:31 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 11:38:31 +0000 Received: from mail-ot0-f179.google.com (mail-ot0-f179.google.com [74.125.82.179]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 99D541A00A2 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f179.google.com with SMTP id a2so5414109oth.2 for ; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 04:38:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxEBuKgz6w7IAdhuqaMO+Ges3bSgfYE4hUxX6WRD6W5F4evfIHt JtY24z8Mp76TJBGGmvggwVrwZPV0Ns/g X-Received: by 10.157.17.166 with SMTP id v35mr18586442otf.194.1496835510818; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 04:38:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.119.72 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:38:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <707000998.4181456.1496814577723@mail.yahoo.com> References: <707000998.4181456.1496814577723.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <707000998.4181456.1496814577723@mail.yahoo.com> From: Anton Vinogradov Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 14:38:30 +0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: IGNITE-5229 is ready for review To: dev@ignite.apache.org, Roman Shtykh Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c192a12e8f30305515d2cf3" archived-at: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 11:38:33 -0000 --94eb2c192a12e8f30305515d2cf3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Roman, Today I added some tips how to request review in most efficient way. See thread '*"Review workflow" changes to prevent "broken review" issues*' for details. I'd like to ask you to help me to check my theory that these tips works. Could you please ask review using tips from https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-SubmittingforReview ? Please let me know will tips help you or not. On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Roman Shtykh wrote: > Igniters, > IGNITE-5229 is ready for review.Now Redis can have its default cache > specified and used as a template when switching to other caches, as > discussed earlier in this ml (please see the JIRA issue). > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5229 > -- Roman > --94eb2c192a12e8f30305515d2cf3--