ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: daemon nodes
Date Wed, 28 Jun 2017 10:52:23 GMT
Hi,
ok, if we have 3 type of nodes: - clients - servers - daemons. Let us merge
all types of daemons in one daemon type and remove unused code for server
daemon. Are there any concerns about this idea?

Best Regards,
Dmitry Pavlov

ср, 28 июн. 2017 г. в 12:19, Dmitriy Govorukhin <
dmitriy.govorukhin@gmail.com>:

> What kind of messages are you talking about? Please, provide example.
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Дмитрий Рябов <somefireone@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Some messages don't go through clients. May be some daemon realization
> will
> > need them?
> >
> > 2017-06-28 11:22 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Govorukhin <
> dmitriy.govorukhin@gmail.com>
> > :
> >
> >> Dmitriy,
> >>
> >> Why daemon node may be server or client? Why it is not just daemon? I
> >> guess if daemon " do not store data or
> >> execute computations " it must be always client daemon. For me, daemon
> >> server, very strange.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
> >> <dsetrakyan@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > Daemon nodes are nodes that join the cluster, but do not store data or
> >> > execute computations or perform any other of the Ignite API-based
> >> > functionality. Visor node is a good example of a daemon node, because
> it
> >> > wants to join the cluster and receive metrics from other nodes, but
> does
> >> > not need to participate in computation or data related functionality.
> >> >
> >> > D.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Dmitriy Govorukhin <
> >> > dmitriy.govorukhin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Igniters,
> >> >>
> >> >> Can somebody explain what does mean  daemon node? I thought that
> exist
> >> >> only client and server node, but node may can be daemon (server
> daemon
> >> >> or client daemon).  As is can see, command line visor join in
> topology
> >> >> as server daemon. Can this be an outdated functionality?
> >> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message