ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 2.1 scope
Date Thu, 01 Jun 2017 15:51:10 GMT
.NET:
* IGNITE-2492 Peer assembly loading - merged
* IGNITE-1894 Delegate support in the API via extension methods - postponed
to 2.2 (see comments)
* IGNITE-4904 DML Delete via LINQ - merged

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> Folks,
>
> We are almost reached proposed feature-complete date (June 2), Could you
> please share current status of your major features?
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Looks a little tight. Let's hope we can make it.
> >
> > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, let me propose the following milestones for 2.1 release then.
> > >
> > > Code freeze: June 2nd.
> > > Final QA and benchmarking: June 5 - June 8
> > > Voting: ~ June 9
> > > Release: ~ June 13
> > >
> > > Also I heard H2 has to be released once again to support Ignite’s
> CREATE
> > > table command. Think that we should talk to H2 folks to make it happen
> in
> > > June 22nd - June 2nd time frame.
> > >
> > > —
> > > Denis
> > >
> > > > On May 11, 2017, at 2:26 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupitsyn@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As for .NET, I would propose to concentrate on peer deployment
> > > (IGNITE-2492)
> > > > and related stuff, like IGNITE-1894 .NET: Delegate support in the API
> > via
> > > > extension methods.
> > > >
> > > > SQL Dependency does not look important to me, we can reschedule it
> for
> > > > later versions.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > > dsetrakyan@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Vyacheslav, I think it is worth the research, but you should always
> > keep
> > > >> data querying and indexing in mind. For example, I don't see how
> > by-page
> > > >> compression will solve it.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <
> > > daradurvs@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Dmitriy,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm researching a best way for this future.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> At the moment I found only one way (querying and indexing
> > compatible),
> > > >> this
> > > >>> is per-objects-field compression.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> But there is a good proffit only for long strings or fields with
> > large
> > > >>> objects.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Maybe it makes sense just to introduce compression for string
> fileds.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm researching the new page-memory architecture as applied to
> > by-page
> > > >>> compression.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2017-05-11 11:30 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > >:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <
> > > >>> daradurvs@gmail.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The described roadmap looks great!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Additional, I vote for introducing an ability (OOTB) to
store
> > objects
> > > >>> in
> > > >>>> a
> > > >>>>> cache in a compressed form.
> > > >>>>> This will allow to store more data at the cost of incriasing
of
> CPU
> > > >>>>> utilization.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> One of the problems with compression is indexing and querying.
How
> > do
> > > >> we
> > > >>>> index the data if it is compressed?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> 2017-05-11 4:23 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Igniters,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Let me start a discussion around the scope for 2.1
release.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> In my vision the main direction of our ongoing efforts
should be
> > > >>>>>> implementing in life a use case of Ignite as a transactional
> > > >>>> distributed
> > > >>>>>> SQL database and HTAP platform. The current use cases
(database
> > > >>> cache,
> > > >>>>> data
> > > >>>>>> grid, micro services platform, etc.) will be supported
as usual,
> > no
> > > >>>>> changes
> > > >>>>>> on that frontier.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Keeping this in mind, the roadmap needs to include
essential SQL
> > > >>>> related
> > > >>>>>> features as well as disk based capabilities, MVCC
support,
> > advanced
> > > >>> DDL
> > > >>>>>> implementation and so on so forth. This is for Ignite
as a SQL
> > > >>>> database.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Next, Machine Learning will be a great addition to
Ignite as an
> > > >> HTAP
> > > >>>>>> platform offering. This is why we should keep investing
our time
> > > >> and
> > > >>>>>> resources in that recently released component.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Having this said, I see the scope for 2.1 release
this way:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> 1. Distributed Persistent Store - if the donation
is accepted by
> > > >> ASF.
> > > >>>> The
> > > >>>>>> decision is to be done in separate discussion. W/o
the store
> > > >>>>>>   Ignite can only be used as In-Memory SQL database.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> 2. SQL Grid:
> > > >>>>>>    - CREATE & DROP table commands: https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4651
> > > >>>>>>    - Renewed JDBC driver: https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4922
> > > >>>>>>    - Collocation based routing of SQL queries:
> > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4510,
> > > >>>>>>       https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4509
> > > >>>>>>    -
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> 3. .NET:
> > > >>>>>>    - Peer-class loading: https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-2492
> > > >>>>>>    - SQLDependency: https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>> jira/browse/IGNITE-2657
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> 4. C++:
> > > >>>>>>    - Compute Grid: https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3574
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> 5. ML Grid:
> > > >>>>>>    - Linear regression algorithms: https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-5012
> > > >>>>>>    - K-means clustering: https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-5113
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Please join the thread and share your thoughts, ideas
and
> > concerns.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>> Best Regards, Vyacheslav
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Best Regards, Vyacheslav
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message