ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: GridGain Donates Persistent Distributed Store To ASF (Apache Ignite)
Date Wed, 17 May 2017 08:01:23 GMT
Sure, those classes will be renamed to use Ignite* prefix.

Any other comments regarding Configuration or public API changes?

2017-05-16 17:12 GMT+03:00 Alexey Kuznetsov <akuznetsov@apache.org>:

> Alexey Goncharuk,
>
> I take a look at source code and noticed classes with names
> like: GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java
> As far as I remember we decided that "Grid" is a kind of "deprecated"
> prefix?
>
> What do you think? Does it make sense to rename?
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Denis,
> >
> > Headers are updated, RAT check is passing now.
> >
> > 2017-05-16 2:37 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
> >
> > > The receipt of the software grant (the persistent store) was
> acknowledged
> > > by Craig Russel.
> > >
> > > Now, we need to move on with this
> > >
> > > > In the meanwhile, I’ve prepared the IP Clearance page referring to
> the
> > > template below but failed to commit the changes to ASF repo:
> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
> > > >
> > > > *Roman S.*, *Cos*, could you help me with this by granting karma or
> > > committing the form from under your account?
> > >
> > > Roman, Cos, could you help with this?
> > >
> > > *Alex G.*, please add Apache 2.0 copyrights to all source files that
> are
> > > going to be donated. Presently there is no copyright at all.
> > >
> > > Everyone interested please spend some time exploring the store's docs
> and
> > > sources shared in my previous email. If no one has any concerns I will
> > > proceed with the donation formalities.
> > >
> > > —
> > > Denis
> > >
> > > > On May 12, 2017, at 2:59 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > The repository with the donation is ready and available for review:
> > > > https://github.com/agoncharuk/ignite/tree/pds-donate
> > > >
> > > > Big and main part of the sources is aggregated in “modules/pds”. The
> > > rest, that connects Apache Ignite memory architecture and SQL engine is
> > > under “core” and “indexing” modules. Alex Goncharuk should be able
to
> > point
> > > to specific files or commits if required.
> > > >
> > > > Here is a description:
> > > > * Persistent Store Overview: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/IGNITE/Persistent+Store+Overview
> > > > * Persistent Store Internal Design: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/IGNITE/Persistent+Store+Internal+Design
> > > >
> > > > The SGA will be signed and sent on Monday.
> > > >
> > > > In the meanwhile, I’ve prepared the IP Clearance page referring to
> the
> > > template below but failed to commit the changes to ASF repo:
> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
> > > >
> > > > *Roman S.*, *Cos*, could you help me with this by granting karma or
> > > committing the form from under your account?
> > > >
> > > > —
> > > > Denis
> > > >
> > > >> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@boudnik.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> While no one is suggesting an IP trap laid out in the non-SGA'ed
> code
> > > >> in this particular case, we don't want to setup a precedent like
> this.
> > > >>
> > > >> From the overall ASF perspective I +1 what Roman has just said.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> --
> > > >> Take care,
> > > >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <
> > > roman@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> > > >>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
> > > >>> <dsetrakyan@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <
> cos@apache.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:54PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Would a standard SGA suffice here?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I believe that ASF guidelines suggest that a discussion
should
> > > happen
> > > >>>>>> first. Once the community gets enough information,
we will move
> to
> > > a PMC
> > > >>>>>> vote. I was under the impression that once the PMC
vote passes,
> > > then the
> > > >>>>>> SGA should be provided. Or does GridGain need to provide
a
> signed
> > > SGA
> > > >>>>> right
> > > >>>>>> away?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> That reminds me of that Pelosi's self-inflicted conundrum
of "In
> > > order
> > > >>>>> to see the bill, we should pass the bill" ;)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Haha :)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> SGA != code. In my view, the code should be provided to the
> > community
> > > for a
> > > >>>> review. But I am struggling to see why should an SGA be signed
> prior
> > > to the
> > > >>>> community accepting the donation.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> There's no such thing as SGA without a reference to a code base.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also, as I explained -- as a community member I would refuse to
> look
> > > >>> at the code base that doesn't have a proper licensing attached
to
> it.
> > > >>> SGA established this kind of proper licensing.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Now, SGA is deinetly not the only way to do so, but it is the
> easiest
> > > >>> and since you'd have to do it anyway the most convenient for the
> > > >>> community.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Roman.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alexey Kuznetsov
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message