ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: GridGain Donates Persistent Distributed Store To ASF (Apache Ignite)
Date Tue, 16 May 2017 14:06:56 GMT
Denis,

Headers are updated, RAT check is passing now.

2017-05-16 2:37 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:

> The receipt of the software grant (the persistent store) was acknowledged
> by Craig Russel.
>
> Now, we need to move on with this
>
> > In the meanwhile, I’ve prepared the IP Clearance page referring to the
> template below but failed to commit the changes to ASF repo:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
> >
> > *Roman S.*, *Cos*, could you help me with this by granting karma or
> committing the form from under your account?
>
> Roman, Cos, could you help with this?
>
> *Alex G.*, please add Apache 2.0 copyrights to all source files that are
> going to be donated. Presently there is no copyright at all.
>
> Everyone interested please spend some time exploring the store's docs and
> sources shared in my previous email. If no one has any concerns I will
> proceed with the donation formalities.
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On May 12, 2017, at 2:59 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > The repository with the donation is ready and available for review:
> > https://github.com/agoncharuk/ignite/tree/pds-donate
> >
> > Big and main part of the sources is aggregated in “modules/pds”. The
> rest, that connects Apache Ignite memory architecture and SQL engine is
> under “core” and “indexing” modules. Alex Goncharuk should be able to point
> to specific files or commits if required.
> >
> > Here is a description:
> > * Persistent Store Overview: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/IGNITE/Persistent+Store+Overview
> > * Persistent Store Internal Design: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/IGNITE/Persistent+Store+Internal+Design
> >
> > The SGA will be signed and sent on Monday.
> >
> > In the meanwhile, I’ve prepared the IP Clearance page referring to the
> template below but failed to commit the changes to ASF repo:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
> >
> > *Roman S.*, *Cos*, could you help me with this by granting karma or
> committing the form from under your account?
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> >> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@boudnik.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> While no one is suggesting an IP trap laid out in the non-SGA'ed code
> >> in this particular case, we don't want to setup a precedent like this.
> >>
> >> From the overall ASF perspective I +1 what Roman has just said.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> Take care,
> >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <
> roman@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
> >>> <dsetrakyan@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:54PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Would a standard SGA suffice here?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I believe that ASF guidelines suggest that a discussion should
> happen
> >>>>>> first. Once the community gets enough information, we will move
to
> a PMC
> >>>>>> vote. I was under the impression that once the PMC vote passes,
> then the
> >>>>>> SGA should be provided. Or does GridGain need to provide a signed
> SGA
> >>>>> right
> >>>>>> away?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That reminds me of that Pelosi's self-inflicted conundrum of "In
> order
> >>>>> to see the bill, we should pass the bill" ;)
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Haha :)
> >>>>
> >>>> SGA != code. In my view, the code should be provided to the community
> for a
> >>>> review. But I am struggling to see why should an SGA be signed prior
> to the
> >>>> community accepting the donation.
> >>>
> >>> There's no such thing as SGA without a reference to a code base.
> >>>
> >>> Also, as I explained -- as a community member I would refuse to look
> >>> at the code base that doesn't have a proper licensing attached to it.
> >>> SGA established this kind of proper licensing.
> >>>
> >>> Now, SGA is deinetly not the only way to do so, but it is the easiest
> >>> and since you'd have to do it anyway the most convenient for the
> >>> community.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Roman.
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message