Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F1C200C6B for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:54:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 618B1160B9C; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AA451160BAB for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:54:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 24819 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2017 12:54:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 24807 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2017 12:54:43 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:54:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6FFC8C05B0 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:54:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kg2d0xrL7Zg9 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4B2AE5F576 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D006FE0458 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 85EAD21B45 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:54:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alexander Belyak (JIRA)" To: dev@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4999) Use one thread pool to flush all CacheWriteBehindStore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:54:45 -0000 Alexander Belyak created IGNITE-4999: ---------------------------------------- Summary: Use one thread pool to flush all CacheWriteBehindStore Key: IGNITE-4999 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4999 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 1.9 Reporter: Alexander Belyak For now we have flusher threads for each CacheWriteBehindStore so we can't create many caches with this mechanism (too many threads). We should use single thread pool for all CacheWriteBehindStore instances (as for TTL). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)