Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6739C200C65 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:09:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 65C70160BA9; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AB051160BA0 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 89335 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2017 14:09:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 89322 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2017 14:09:12 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:09:12 +0000 Received: from mail-qt0-f176.google.com (mail-qt0-f176.google.com [209.85.216.176]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 89AB31A0280 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f176.google.com with SMTP id g60so68476707qtd.3 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 07:09:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4B4NoADqcdNQYGzwD9APN4/crp+iqxBJ+ntrRLDOnbG2rp87k9 ABtUfxIJO4bWU1ZUaYJsH/sTWqkqr9nW X-Received: by 10.200.45.122 with SMTP id o55mr14644498qta.203.1493474951711; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 07:09:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.79.136 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 07:09:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1493420586256-17338.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Alexey Kuznetsov Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 21:09:11 +0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.0.0 RC1 To: dev@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f49e4fa6c83054e4ebbcf archived-at: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:09:14 -0000 --001a113f49e4fa6c83054e4ebbcf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sergey, Good cacth. I think this issue is a blocker to release. -1 from me (binding). However I'v already pushed the fix, please check it. On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: > Nik, > > Thanks, that you spotted this issue. > > Could you provide a simple reproducer & create issue in JIRA? > > > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 6:03 AM, npordash wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> Sorry to post this in a voting thread, but I tried to update a project to >> 2.0 (using the git tag Denis referred to) and I'm seeing what I assume is >> a >> regression. In short, attempts to access a pre-configured cache within the >> onIgniteStart() method of a PluginProvider now returns null instead of >> returning the cache. In 1.9 this was not returning null. >> >> Is this an intended behavioral change? According to the javadoc it still >> states that Ignite has fully started by the time onIgniteStart() is >> invoked. >> >> Thanks! >> -Nick >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-developer >> s.2346864.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Ignite-2-0-0-RC1-tp17335p17338.html >> Sent from the Apache Ignite Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- > Alexey Kuznetsov > -- Alexey Kuznetsov --001a113f49e4fa6c83054e4ebbcf--