ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite Website Audit Status
Date Fri, 03 Feb 2017 23:53:24 GMT
Hi Terry,

Such a valuable feedback and analysis! Thanks for doing this. 

At least I can assist Mauricio reviewing and committing the changes. Mauricio, as a contributor,
you can grab the site source from here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ignite/site/trunk

—
Denis

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 2:43 PM, Terry Erisman <terisman@gridgain.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Igniters,
> 
> 
> 
> We have completed the initial stage of analyzing the Apache Ignite website.
> Based on the initial review, we identified the following issues:
> 
> 
> 
> *	An http and https version of the site are both resolving. Neither
> has a canonical tag on them. 
> 
> *	Https is the one being submitted in sitemaps
> 
> *	There are no canonical tags found anywhere on the site. A
> self-referencing should be implemented on every page that should be indexed
> as is. 
> *	There is a large disparity between the sitemap pages indexed and the
> total pages found in the Google index. 
> 
> *	2,895 submitted in the sitemap --> 739 indexed by Google
> 
> *	Many of these are documentation javadoc pages
> 
> *	Crawl found 32,000 
> *	Sitemap contains 1,011 
> *	Index contains 2,240
> 
> *	12,200 pages found in the Google index
> 
> *	No Schema is implemented
> *	No Meta Descriptions are present
> *	Page Titles could use some optimizations
> 
> 
> 
> Based on these findings to date, we would like to do the following:
> 
> 
> 
> *         Create a canonical tag on the https: version of the site and
> implement 301 redirects from the http: pages to the https: versions
> 
> *         Explore the issue of the sitemap and indexed pages further and
> report back the findings and suggested changes at that time. It is generally
> not a good situation that the site has 12,200 pages indexed by Google when
> we are submitting 2,895 via the sitemap with only 739 of those are being
> indexed by Google. The perfect situation would be that we submitted X pages
> and Google indexed all X of those pages - we won't get to that point on a
> site of this size, but we are a long way from it.
> 
> *         We will explore the issue of implementing Schema and develop a
> plan for rolling it out across the website.
> 
> *         We will create a list of pages which require meta descriptions
> and/or page title optimizations and begin developing recommendations for the
> modifications on a page-by-page basis.
> 
> 
> 
> I spoke with Mauricio Stekl who volunteered to apply the required changes
> and contribute them back to the Ignite website's source code. Are there any
> committers who are willing to review the changes and merge them?
> 
> 
> 
> Our SEO audit is ongoing and we are exploring many other aspects of the
> website. The above list is the first set of actionable feedback. There will
> almost certainly be more.
> 
> 
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
> 
> 
> 
> Best,
> 
> 
> 
> Terry 
> 
> 
> 
> terisman@gridgain.com <mailto:terisman@gridgain.com>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message