Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC073200BF7 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 21:43:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id AA98B160B3E; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 20:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id F361A160B2F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 21:43:23 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 17791 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2017 20:43:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 17779 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2017 20:43:23 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:43:23 +0000 Received: from mail-qt0-f178.google.com (mail-qt0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id AF8B01A0329 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 20:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f178.google.com with SMTP id l7so98431456qtd.1 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:43:22 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLT5MtmUmuvCFvL+WWLZqnf2/X6H+/dse0k9gqP1PXV6qVrCCTW5u5NziBS+o8elHeAXBvfhQ6+cE5W7y0l X-Received: by 10.200.34.73 with SMTP id p9mr95572020qtp.25.1483994601977; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:43:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.237.62.165 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:42:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dmitriy Setrakyan Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:42:41 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Extend TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder functionality To: dev@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11350cf219e13c0545af6b53 archived-at: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:43:24 -0000 --001a11350cf219e13c0545af6b53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Sergey Kozlov wrote: > Hi > > Thanks Yakov and Vladimir! > > In general I'm ok for Yakov's suggestion though a bit not clear why > discovery by network mask will take long time. Is the discovery spi > single-threaded and Ignite processes the addresses consequentially? > Sergey, I think trying out every address within the mask will take a while. I like Yakov's suggestion as well. > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Vladimir Ozerov > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Yakov Zhdanov > wrote: > > > > > Agree with Vladimir. > > > > > > However, this functionality maybe useful in some cases. As far as I > > > remember we support port range notation, e.g. 127.0.0.1:47500..47509, > > but > > > we don't have this for addresses. If we implement this I would suggest > > the > > > same approach, e.g 192.168.0.1..5:47500 > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > > > > -- > Sergey Kozlov > GridGain Systems > www.gridgain.com > --001a11350cf219e13c0545af6b53--