ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: moving to geronimo JCache jar
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2017 03:04:31 GMT
Any reason why we need to wait for 2.0? Sorry if this has already been
discussed.

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:

> Yes, we planned to do that in 2.0. Val, the ticket is closed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2949 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2949>
>
> Do we need to reopen it making sure that geronimo jar is added to 2.0?
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Jan 24, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > We absolutely need to upgrade to the geronimo jcache library in the next
> > release.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> > valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Guys,
> >>
> >> I noticed that the JCache license was updated to Apache 2.0 several
> months
> >> ago [1]. However, there was no release with the new license and 1.0.0
> still
> >> has the old license name in the POM file [2] (the link is pointing to
> the
> >> new one though).
> >>
> >> Is this enough from legal standpoint? Do we still need to move to
> Geronimo?
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
> >> [2] http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/javax.cache/cache-api/1.0.0
> >>
> >> -Val
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrakyan@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would say that we are OK with alpha for now, as there is no real
> >>> difference between 1.0-alpha and 1.0. We can switch to 1.0 whenever
> >>> geronimo project updates the JAR.
> >>>
> >>> D.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> >>> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> I tried to switch to Geronimo and it works fine for me. Are we going
> to
> >>>> wait for version 1.0, or we're OK with alpha?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Val
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> >>> dsetrakyan@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can someone check if the Geronimo JCache jar is the same as the
> >> JSR107?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.geronimo.
> >>> specs/geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We should try switching to the Geronimo JAR starting next release,
as
> >>> it
> >>>> is
> >>>>> licensed under Apache 2.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> D.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message