ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: moving to geronimo JCache jar
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:04:13 GMT
We need to replace content of ignite-core-licenses.txt file which is the following at the moment

// ------------------------------------------------------------------
// List of ignite-core module's dependencies provided as a part of this distribution
// which licenses differ from Apache Software License.
// ------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================================================================
For JSR107 API and SPI (https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec) javax.cache:cache-api:jar:1.0.0
==============================================================================
This product bundles JSR107 API and SPI which is available under a:
JSR-000107 JCACHE 2.9 Public Review - Updated Specification License. For details, see https://raw.github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/master/LICENSE.txt.


Updated this ticket description: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3793

—
Denis
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:24 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Awesome, you are right. I just checked and the license is indeed Apache
> 2.0. Is there anything we need to do at all right now?
> 
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> This change was incorporated in this ticket: https://issues.apache.
>> org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3793. We can't do it before 2.0 for compatibility
>> reasons.
>> 
>> However, my point is that they changed the license to Apache 2.0, so I'm
>> not sure that licensing issue still exists.
>> 
>> -Val
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Any reason why we need to wait for 2.0? Sorry if this has already been
>>> discussed.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yes, we planned to do that in 2.0. Val, the ticket is closed
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2949 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2949>
>>>> 
>>>> Do we need to reopen it making sure that geronimo jar is added to 2.0?
>>>> 
>>>> —
>>>> Denis
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 24, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
>> dsetrakyan@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> We absolutely need to upgrade to the geronimo jcache library in the
>>> next
>>>>> release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
>>>>> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Guys,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I noticed that the JCache license was updated to Apache 2.0 several
>>>> months
>>>>>> ago [1]. However, there was no release with the new license and
>> 1.0.0
>>>> still
>>>>>> has the old license name in the POM file [2] (the link is pointing
>> to
>>>> the
>>>>>> new one though).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is this enough from legal standpoint? Do we still need to move to
>>>> Geronimo?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
>>>>>> [2] http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/javax.cache/cache-api/1.0.0
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Val
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
>>>> dsetrakyan@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would say that we are OK with alpha for now, as there is no
real
>>>>>>> difference between 1.0-alpha and 1.0. We can switch to 1.0 whenever
>>>>>>> geronimo project updates the JAR.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
>>>>>>> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I tried to switch to Geronimo and it works fine for me. Are
we
>> going
>>>> to
>>>>>>>> wait for version 1.0, or we're OK with alpha?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -Val
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
>>>>>>> dsetrakyan@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Can someone check if the Geronimo JCache jar is the same
as the
>>>>>> JSR107?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.geronimo.
>>>>>>> specs/geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> We should try switching to the Geronimo JAR starting
next
>> release,
>>> as
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> licensed under Apache 2.0.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message