ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date Fri, 02 Dec 2016 23:08:24 GMT
Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits for
all the fixes you are making?

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
>
> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:
>
> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the
> result from the right side
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Vladimir,
> >
> > Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks
> like
> > > we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which
> looks
> > > pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
> > > start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
> > >
> > > Vladimir.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Denis,
> > >>
> > >> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
> > already
> > >> resolved
> > >> by another fix made by Alexander.
> > >>
> > >> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
> > >>
> > >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
> > >> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Igor
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from
> PHP
> > >> PDO
> > >>> side.
> > >>>
> > >>> The first one is related to DML.
> > >>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
> > >>>
> > >>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue
> before
> > >>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
> > >>>
> > >>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only.
> > Igor
> > >>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> > >>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in
> DSN <
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
> > >>>
> > >>> —
> > >>> Denis
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Update for DML testing:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
> > >>> previous
> > >>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
> > >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Vladimir,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this
feature
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote
> computation
> > >> is
> > >>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature
here.
> > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> —
> > >>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable
> tickets
> > >> you
> > >>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
> > skozlov@gridgain.com
> > >>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted
into three
> > parts
> > >>> in
> > >>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the
moment I see
> > >>>>> following
> > >>>>>>> unclear points
> > >>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > >>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> > >> ignite-cassandra-store?
> > >>>>> In
> > >>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko
<
> > >>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280
fix (already
> > merged
> > >>> in
> > >>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be
in pull
> > >>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not
> fixed).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com
> >:
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException:
Failed to send
> > >> message
> > >>>>>>>> because
> > >>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
> > jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns
wrong result
> > >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir
Ozerov <
> > >>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according
to JIRA reports
> > >> several
> > >>>>>>>> problems
> > >>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus
on DML finalization
> in
> > >>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it,
targeting them for
> the
> > >>> next
> > >>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego
<
> > >> isapego@gridgain.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged
them into ignite-1.8.
> > >> But
> > >>>>>>> now
> > >>>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>>> have some
> > >>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm
currently working on
> > them.
> > >>>>>>> There
> > >>>>>>>>>> is a
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
> > >>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll
add all my findings there.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis
Magda <
> > dmagda@apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making
this happen!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO
related
> changes?
> > >>>>>>> Can I
> > >>>>>>>>>>> start
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1]
is correct?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM,
Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed
with Sergi that DML branch is
> now
> > >>>>>>> good
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch
that is to be created.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should
they be made, and test fixes
> will
> > >> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate
patches later.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that,
in order to deliver these new
> > >>>>>>>> features
> > >>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be
fixed in later releases
> (shortly):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00
Alexander Paschenko
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00
Vladimir Ozerov <
> > >>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining
tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> > >> seems
> > >>>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release.
As far as I understand the
> biggest
> > >>>>>>>>>> remaining
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1].
I think we can create separate branch
> > >> for
> > >>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> soon
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex,
do you have any idea on when it
> > might
> > >>>>>>>>>> happen?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016
at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will
be created after 1.8 gets released.
> > >>>>>>> Recently
> > >>>>>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on
the dev list [1] regarding the
> > difficulties
> > >>>>>>>>>> related
> > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance
when several documentation
> > >> versions
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided
that rather then create a new version for
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature
added to Ignite it’s better to
> create a
> > >>>>>>>> hidden
> > >>>>>>>>>>> page
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current
documentation version and make it
> > visible
> > >>>>>>>> once
> > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> next
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created
after the release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line
is that, please create a hidden page
> with
> > a
> > >>>>>>>> suffix
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8”
and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> > >> create
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/>
1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16,
2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to
add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday,
November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense
to wait for me while everything gets
> > merged
> > >>>>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let
me know over this discussion when the
> > >>>>>>> overall
> > >>>>>>>>>> merge
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov
15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > >>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge
PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without
> DML
> > >>>>>>> they
> > >>>>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even
compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
> > >> that
> > >>>>>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> DML
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML
is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> > >> merge
> > >>>>>>> my
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything
works as intended. The code itself,
> > tests
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> examples
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue,
Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
[1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> > >>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> > >>>>>>>>>>> binary
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not
a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
> > >> 1.8.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than
that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> > >> can.
> > >>>>>>>> But I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> can't
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the
way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue,
Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dmagda@apache.org>>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander
P., Igor S.,*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When
will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> > >>>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch?
I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > >>>>>>>> documentation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
everything works as described on my side.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do
you think it will be possible to complete all the
> > >> .NET
> > >>>>>>>>>>> usability
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
[2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> > >>>>>>> Ignite
> > >>>>>>>>>>> users?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On
Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do
we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
> who
> > >>>>>>> can
> > >>>>>>>>>> take
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> over
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
process of 1.8?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On
Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com
<mailto:
> > >>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current
status on DML:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic
data streamer support implemented (basicness
> is
> > >>>>>>>> mostly
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration
- say, currently there's no way to
> > specify
> > >>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch
size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > >>>>>>>> easily).
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed
all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There
are some tests that started failing after
> > binary
> > >>>>>>>> hash
> > >>>>>>>>>>> codes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation
rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> > >>>>>>> branch,
> > >>>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ask
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him
to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live
> > in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest,
and are as
> > >>>>>>> follows:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added
them personally during working on first
> version
> > >> of
> > >>>>>>>> auto
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing
few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
> > >> very
> > >>>>>>>>>>> hashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features.
Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> > >>>>>>> passed.
> > >>>>>>>> So
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
please take a look?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working
on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message