Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org
From: Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
Message-Id: <97F81EAB-8419-4071-A017-06FD5E631430@apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_DF459518-64D9-4104-9718-734A978C8607"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Subject: Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:08:43 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CALOGAoxt_WFnj9qgrAGZYoVm_pWsE3Un-OGqMq2YopCUZRviOw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dev@ignite.apache.org,
 alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com
To: Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com>
References: <CAJhSPbp7oteJQtFEud+hUqdT=ybWepZPynyczq6dCMghSqrhpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1704A472-3B34-4D33-9907-0747568A5A67@gridgain.com>
 <A440B346-C339-4CCB-8F16-FF45ACBDFC6C@apache.org>
 <CAK2_iMMrkjhngYokRXWqWJXTEmbWWPeYazY8LwQhaxCTj-=Xvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALOGAoxt_WFnj9qgrAGZYoVm_pWsE3Un-OGqMq2YopCUZRviOw@mail.gmail.com>
archived-at: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:08:46 -0000

--Apple-Mail=_DF459518-64D9-4104-9718-734A978C8607
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

Igor,

It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8 =
then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge =
happens.

=E2=80=94
Denis

> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com> wrote:
>=20
> Denis,
>=20
> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will =
break tests
> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML =
is merged.
>=20
> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes =
and check
> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples =
are ready.
>=20
>=20
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>=20
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupitsyn@apache.org =
<mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>> wrote:
> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary =
mode)
> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't
> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>=20
> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>=20
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 =
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 =
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>=20
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org =
<mailto:dmagda@apache.org>> wrote:
>=20
> > *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >
> > When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8
> > branch? I=E2=80=99m looking forward to go through PDO [1] =
documentation and be sure
> > that everything works as described on my side.
> >
> > *Pavel,*
> >
> > Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
> > tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 =
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 =
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >
> > =E2=80=94
> > Denis
> >
> > On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com =
<mailto:dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take =
over the
> > release process of 1.8?
> >
> > =E2=80=94
> > Denis
> >
> > On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com =
<mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Current status on DML:
> >
> > - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about
> > configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
> > batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
> >
> > - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >
> > - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
> > generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will =
ask
> > him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
> >     - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >     - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >     - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > I added them personally during working on first version of auto
> > hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
> > features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could
> > you please take a look?
> >
> > - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >
> > - Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
>=20


--Apple-Mail=_DF459518-64D9-4104-9718-734A978C8607--