ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:51:28 GMT
Alexey

The optional module means that we can copy it in libs and it will provide
its functionality. What new functionality provides empty directory?

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov <akuznetsov@apache.org>
wrote:

> Sergey,
>
> As far as I know "ignite-cassandra" is a root folder.
>
> "ignite-cassandra-store" - contains module with Cassandra store.
> "ignite-cassandra-serializers" - module that contains optional serializers
>  for Cassandra store (for example with Kryo).
> it is implemented as separate (optional) module because of Kryo based
> serializers may bring not needed dependency.
>
> Igor, could you confirm this?
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following
>> unclear points
>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In
>> that case why do not make one module?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
>> > 1.8 branch).
>> >
>> > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>> > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
>> >
>> > - Alex
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>:
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > I found two issues for 1.8:
>> > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
>> > because
>> > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
>> > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>> > >
>> > > Could someone experienced take a look?
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Folks,
>> > >>
>> > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
>> > problems
>> > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
>> > ignite-1.8
>> > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
>> > >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>> > >>
>> > >> Any objections?
>> > >>
>> > >> Vladimir.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Denis,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
But
>> now
>> > we
>> > >> > have some
>> > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
>> There
>> > >> is a
>> > >> > ticket for
>> > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Best Regards,
>> > >> > Igor
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > Alexander,
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
>> Can I
>> > >> > start
>> > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability
<
>> > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > —
>> > >> > > Denis
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> > >> > > alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Folks,
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch
is now
>> good
>> > to
>> > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
will be
>> > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these
new
>> > features
>> > >> on
>> > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On failing tests:
>> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>> > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > - Alex
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>> > >> > > > <alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>:
>> > >> > > >> Vlad,
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> Most likely today.
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> - Alex
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>> vozerov@gridgain.com
>> > >:
>> > >> > > >>> Igniters,
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to
1.8 and it seems
>> > that
>> > >> we
>> > >> > > are
>> > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand
the biggest
>> > >> remaining
>> > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate
branch for
>> > 1.8
>> > >> as
>> > >> > > soon
>> > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea
on when it might
>> > >> happen?
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> Vladimir.
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda
<
>> dmagda@apache.org
>> > >
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>> Roman,
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8
gets released.
>> Recently
>> > >> > there
>> > >> > > was
>> > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding
the difficulties
>> > >> related
>> > >> > to
>> > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
>> versions
>> > >> > > co-exist at
>> > >> > > >>>> the same time.
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a
new version for the
>> > >> > > documentation
>> > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s
better to create a
>> > hidden
>> > >> > page
>> > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version
and make it visible
>> > once
>> > >> the
>> > >> > > next
>> > >> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a
hidden page with a
>> > suffix
>> > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released
Prachi will
>> create
>> > >> > > readme.io <
>> > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your
doc visible.
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>> > >> td10868.html
>> > >> > <
>> > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>> > >> > td10868.html>
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>> —
>> > >> > > >>>> Denis
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>> > >> > <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >>>> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>> Denis,
>> > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io
for new features?
>> > >> > > >>>>> -Roman
>> > >> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08
AM, Denis Magda <
>> > >> > > >>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>> Igor,
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while
everything gets merged
>> > into
>> > >> 1.8
>> > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion
when the
>> overall
>> > >> merge
>> > >> > > >>>> happens.
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>> —
>> > >> > > >>>>> Denis
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor
Sapego <
>> > isapego@gridgain.com>
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes
into 1.8 but without DML
>> they
>> > >> will
>> > >> > > >>>> break tests
>> > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't
see any sense in doing
>> that
>> > >> before
>> > >> > > DML
>> > >> > > >>>> is merged.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll
need some time to
>> merge my
>> > >> > > changes
>> > >> > > >>>> and check
>> > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended.
The code itself, tests
>> and
>> > >> > > examples
>> > >> > > >>>> are ready.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
>> > >> > > >>>>>> Igor
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM,
Pavel Tupitsyn <
>> > >> > > ptupitsyn@apache.org
>> > >> > > >>>> <mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>>
wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>> CacheEntryProcessor
>> > >> > binary
>> > >> > > >>>> mode)
>> > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't
be able to do that for
>> 1.8.
>> > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit
as many of them as I can.
>> > But I
>> > >> > > can't
>> > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't
see any date yet.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help
with the reviews.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
<
>> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
<
>> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM,
Denis Magda <
>> > dmagda@apache.org
>> > >> > > >>>> <mailto:dmagda@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML
and ODBC (PDO) related
>> changes
>> > >> into
>> > >> > > 1.8
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward
to go through PDO [1]
>> > documentation
>> > >> > > and be
>> > >> > > >>>> sure
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described
on my side.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible
to complete all the .NET
>> > >> > usability
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll
them out to the Apache
>> Ignite
>> > >> > users?
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
<
>> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
<
>> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> —
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM,
Denis Magda <
>> > dmagda@gridgain.com
>> > >> > > <mailto:
>> > >> > > >>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8?
Is there anyone who
>> can
>> > >> take
>> > >> > > over
>> > >> > > >>>> the
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> —
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM,
Alexander Paschenko <
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com
<mailto:
>> > alexander.a.paschenko@
>> > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support
implemented (basicness is
>> > mostly
>> > >> > > about
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently
there's no way to specify
>> > >> > streamer's
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver,
but this can be improved
>> > easily).
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed
with Vladimir.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that
started failing after binary
>> > hash
>> > >> > codes
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir
in ignite-4011-1
>> branch,
>> > I
>> > >> > will
>> > >> > > ask
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix
those. Failing tests live in
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest,
and are as
>> follows:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during
working on first version
>> of
>> > auto
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what
they do is test these
>> very
>> > >> > hashing
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's
rework those tests
>> passed.
>> > So
>> > >> > > could
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments
about current code.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Sergey Kozlov
>> > > GridGain Systems
>> > > www.gridgain.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Kozlov
>> GridGain Systems
>> www.gridgain.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alexey Kuznetsov
>



-- 
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message