ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:57:02 GMT
IGNITE-4249: ODBC latency improved.
IGNITE-3587: Added Distributed Joins support for ODBC.
IGNITE-3390: Added DSN support for ODBC.


Best Regards,
Igor

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Andrey Mashenkov <
andrey.mashenkov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Vladimir,
>
> IGNITE-3735: ODBC escape sequences support
> IGNITE-3448: DISTINCT Aggregates support added
> IGNITE-4145: Fixed race in distributed SQL queries
> IGNITE-2974: ODBC NIO support
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Andrey Gura <agura@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Vladimir,
> >
> > IGNITE-2968 and IGNITE-2969 introduce deadlock detection for transactions
> > on near caches and for optimistic transactions.
> > I think it should be added to release notes.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> > > completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> > >
> > > Vladimir.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts
> in
> > > > optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> > following
> > > > unclear points
> > > > 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > > > 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> ignite-cassandra-store?
> > In
> > > > that case why do not make one module?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > > alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged
> > in
> > > > > 1.8 branch).
> > > > >
> > > > > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > > > > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> > > > >
> > > > > - Alex
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>:
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I found two issues for 1.8:
> > > > > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
> > message
> > > > > because
> > > > > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> > > > > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could someone experienced take a look?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > > > vozerov@gridgain.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Folks,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
> several
> > > > > problems
> > > > > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization
in
> > > > > ignite-1.8
> > > > > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them
for the
> > next
> > > > > >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Any objections?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Vladimir.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> > isapego@gridgain.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Denis,
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
> > But
> > > > now
> > > > > we
> > > > > >> > have some
> > > > > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working
on
> them.
> > > > There
> > > > > >> is a
> > > > > >> > ticket for
> > > > > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings
there.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Best Regards,
> > > > > >> > Igor
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
> dmagda@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Alexander,
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO
related
> changes?
> > > > Can I
> > > > > >> > start
> > > > > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
> > <
> > > > > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > —
> > > > > >> > > Denis
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko
<
> > > > > >> > > alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Folks,
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that
DML branch is
> now
> > > > good
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be
created.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made,
and test fixes
> will
> > > be
> > > > > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches
later.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to
deliver these new
> > > > > features
> > > > > >> on
> > > > > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later
releases
> > (shortly):
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On failing tests:
> > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > > > > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > - Alex
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > > > > >> > > > <alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>:
> > > > > >> > > >> Vlad,
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> Most likely today.
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> - Alex
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov
<
> > > > vozerov@gridgain.com
> > > > > >:
> > > > > >> > > >>> Igniters,
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets
assigned to 1.8 and it
> > > seems
> > > > > that
> > > > > >> we
> > > > > >> > > are
> > > > > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as
I understand the
> > biggest
> > > > > >> remaining
> > > > > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can
create separate
> branch
> > > for
> > > > > 1.8
> > > > > >> as
> > > > > >> > > soon
> > > > > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have
any idea on when it
> > might
> > > > > >> happen?
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM,
Denis Magda <
> > > > dmagda@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> Roman,
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created
after 1.8 gets released.
> > > > Recently
> > > > > >> > there
> > > > > >> > > was
> > > > > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list
[1] regarding the
> > difficulties
> > > > > >> related
> > > > > >> > to
> > > > > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when
several documentation
> > > versions
> > > > > >> > > co-exist at
> > > > > >> > > >>>> the same time.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then
create a new version
> for
> > > the
> > > > > >> > > documentation
> > > > > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite
it’s better to
> create
> > a
> > > > > hidden
> > > > > >> > page
> > > > > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation
version and make it
> > visible
> > > > > once
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > next
> > > > > >> > > >>>> version is created after the
release.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please
create a hidden page
> > with a
> > > > > suffix
> > > > > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once
1.8 gets released Prachi will
> > > create
> > > > > >> > > readme.io <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and
make your doc visible.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
> consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > > > >> td10868.html
> > > > > >> > <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
> consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > > > >> > td10868.html>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> —
> > > > > >> > > >>>> Denis
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00
PM, Roman Shtykh
> > > > > >> > <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in
readme.io for new features?
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> -Roman
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November
16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis
> Magda <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> Igor,
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for
me while everything gets
> > merged
> > > > > into
> > > > > >> 1.8
> > > > > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over
this discussion when the
> > > > overall
> > > > > >> merge
> > > > > >> > > >>>> happens.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> —
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> Denis
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45
AM, Igor Sapego <
> > > > > isapego@gridgain.com>
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related
changes into 1.8 but without
> > DML
> > > > they
> > > > > >> will
> > > > > >> > > >>>> break tests
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation
so I don't see any sense in
> doing
> > > that
> > > > > >> before
> > > > > >> > > DML
> > > > > >> > > >>>> is merged.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and
merged I'll need some time to
> > > merge
> > > > my
> > > > > >> > > changes
> > > > > >> > > >>>> and check
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works
as intended. The code itself,
> > tests
> > > > and
> > > > > >> > > examples
> > > > > >> > > >>>> are ready.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> Igor
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016
at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > > > >> > > ptupitsyn@apache.org
> > > > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>>
wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on
[2], and [2](.NET:
> > > > CacheEntryProcessor
> > > > > >> > binary
> > > > > >> > > >>>> mode)
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing.
We won't be able to do that
> for
> > > 1.8.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll
try to fit as many of them as I
> > > can.
> > > > > But I
> > > > > >> > > can't
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question
since I don't see any date yet.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were
going to help with the reviews.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
> > <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
> > <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016
at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > > > dmagda@apache.org
> > > > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:dmagda@apache.org>>
wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor
S.,*
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge
all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> > > > changes
> > > > > >> into
> > > > > >> > > 1.8
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking
forward to go through PDO [1]
> > > > > documentation
> > > > > >> > > and be
> > > > > >> > > >>>> sure
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works
as described on my side.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will
be possible to complete all the
> > > .NET
> > > > > >> > usability
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under
1.8 and roll them out to the
> Apache
> > > > Ignite
> > > > > >> > users?
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
> > <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
> > <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at
6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > > > dmagda@gridgain.com
> > > > > >> > > <mailto:
> > > > > >> > > >>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch
for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
> > who
> > > > can
> > > > > >> take
> > > > > >> > > over
> > > > > >> > > >>>> the
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of
1.8?
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at
9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com
<mailto:
> > > > > alexander.a.paschenko@
> > > > > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on
DML:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer
support implemented (basicness
> > is
> > > > > mostly
> > > > > >> > > about
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say,
currently there's no way to
> > specify
> > > > > >> > streamer's
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC
driver, but this can be improved
> > > > > easily).
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor
stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some
tests that started failing after
> > binary
> > > > > hash
> > > > > >> > codes
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework
made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> > > > branch,
> > > > > I
> > > > > >> > will
> > > > > >> > > ask
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into
it and fix those. Failing tests
> live
> > in
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest,
and are as
> > > > follows:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally
during working on first
> > version
> > > of
> > > > > auto
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks
ago, and what they do is test
> these
> > > very
> > > > > >> > hashing
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again,
prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> > > > passed.
> > > > > So
> > > > > >> > > could
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a
look?
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey
V.'s comments about current
> code.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > > > > GridGain Systems
> > > > > > www.gridgain.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > > GridGain Systems
> > > > www.gridgain.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> С уважением,
> Машенков Андрей Владимирович
> Тел. +7-921-932-61-82
>
> Best regards,
> Andrey V. Mashenkov
> Cerr: +7-921-932-61-82
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message