ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date Fri, 25 Nov 2016 13:40:38 GMT
Vladimir,

IGNITE-2968 and IGNITE-2969 introduce deadlock detection for transactions
on near caches and for optimistic transactions.
I think it should be added to release notes.

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
> > optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following
> > unclear points
> > 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In
> > that case why do not make one module?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
> > > 1.8 branch).
> > >
> > > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> > >
> > > - Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I found two issues for 1.8:
> > > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
> > > because
> > > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> > > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > > >
> > > > Could someone experienced take a look?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > vozerov@gridgain.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Folks,
> > > >>
> > > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
> > > problems
> > > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> > > ignite-1.8
> > > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
> > > >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > > >>
> > > >> Any objections?
> > > >>
> > > >> Vladimir.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Denis,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
But
> > now
> > > we
> > > >> > have some
> > > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> > There
> > > >> is a
> > > >> > ticket for
> > > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Best Regards,
> > > >> > Igor
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Alexander,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> > Can I
> > > >> > start
> > > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability
<
> > > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > —
> > > >> > > Denis
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > >> > > alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Folks,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch
is now
> > good
> > > to
> > > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
will
> be
> > > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these
new
> > > features
> > > >> on
> > > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
(shortly):
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On failing tests:
> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > - Alex
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > > >> > > > <alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>:
> > > >> > > >> Vlad,
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Most likely today.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> - Alex
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> > vozerov@gridgain.com
> > > >:
> > > >> > > >>> Igniters,
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to
1.8 and it
> seems
> > > that
> > > >> we
> > > >> > > are
> > > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand
the biggest
> > > >> remaining
> > > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate
branch
> for
> > > 1.8
> > > >> as
> > > >> > > soon
> > > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea
on when it might
> > > >> happen?
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda
<
> > dmagda@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>>> Roman,
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8
gets released.
> > Recently
> > > >> > there
> > > >> > > was
> > > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding
the difficulties
> > > >> related
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several
documentation
> versions
> > > >> > > co-exist at
> > > >> > > >>>> the same time.
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create
a new version for
> the
> > > >> > > documentation
> > > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s
better to create a
> > > hidden
> > > >> > page
> > > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version
and make it visible
> > > once
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > next
> > > >> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create
a hidden page with a
> > > suffix
> > > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released
Prachi will
> create
> > > >> > > readme.io <
> > > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your
doc visible.
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > >> td10868.html
> > > >> > <
> > > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > >> > td10868.html>
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman
Shtykh
> > > >> > <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io
for new features?
> > > >> > > >>>>> -Roman
> > > >> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08
AM, Denis Magda <
> > > >> > > >>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> Igor,
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while
everything gets merged
> > > into
> > > >> 1.8
> > > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion
when the
> > overall
> > > >> merge
> > > >> > > >>>> happens.
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor
Sapego <
> > > isapego@gridgain.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes
into 1.8 but without DML
> > they
> > > >> will
> > > >> > > >>>> break tests
> > > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't
see any sense in doing
> that
> > > >> before
> > > >> > > DML
> > > >> > > >>>> is merged.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll
need some time to
> merge
> > my
> > > >> > > changes
> > > >> > > >>>> and check
> > > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended.
The code itself, tests
> > and
> > > >> > > examples
> > > >> > > >>>> are ready.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Igor
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM,
Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > >> > > ptupitsyn@apache.org
> > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>>
wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and
[2](.NET:
> > CacheEntryProcessor
> > > >> > binary
> > > >> > > >>>> mode)
> > > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't
be able to do that for
> 1.8.
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit
as many of them as I
> can.
> > > But I
> > > >> > > can't
> > > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't
see any date yet.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help
with the reviews.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
<
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
<
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM,
Denis Magda <
> > > dmagda@apache.org
> > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:dmagda@apache.org>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML
and ODBC (PDO) related
> > changes
> > > >> into
> > > >> > > 1.8
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward
to go through PDO [1]
> > > documentation
> > > >> > > and be
> > > >> > > >>>> sure
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described
on my side.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible
to complete all the
> .NET
> > > >> > usability
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll
them out to the Apache
> > Ignite
> > > >> > users?
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
<
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
<
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM,
Denis Magda <
> > > dmagda@gridgain.com
> > > >> > > <mailto:
> > > >> > > >>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8?
Is there anyone who
> > can
> > > >> take
> > > >> > > over
> > > >> > > >>>> the
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM,
Alexander Paschenko <
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com
<mailto:
> > > alexander.a.paschenko@
> > > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support
implemented (basicness is
> > > mostly
> > > >> > > about
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently
there's no way to specify
> > > >> > streamer's
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver,
but this can be improved
> > > easily).
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed
with Vladimir.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that
started failing after binary
> > > hash
> > > >> > codes
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir
in ignite-4011-1
> > branch,
> > > I
> > > >> > will
> > > >> > > ask
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix
those. Failing tests live in
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest,
and are as
> > follows:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during
working on first version
> of
> > > auto
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and
what they do is test these
> very
> > > >> > hashing
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's
rework those tests
> > passed.
> > > So
> > > >> > > could
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments
about current code.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > > GridGain Systems
> > > > www.gridgain.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergey Kozlov
> > GridGain Systems
> > www.gridgain.com
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message