Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMpMOYGe_hnev490EjwH0Q-2tB3FyuMWRkSGS9BzzzDOL47RjQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABuYRco33-EeX+ADFbiR2gsCMGm+c_BRjbt2g56SbWBb6OCLiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <22374872-5873-4011-BB15-E96988F4B074@gridgain.com> <CAMpMOYGe_hnev490EjwH0Q-2tB3FyuMWRkSGS9BzzzDOL47RjQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:43:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+0=VoVgGXY4hAC1n5=MuZ26mH5GEXqjPaxwHuH92zoa8HtPZg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Global off-heap memory limit
To: dev@ignite.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e6082ade6a3053c9111b9
archived-at: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 19:44:11 -0000

--001a114e6082ade6a3053c9111b9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To my knowledge, in Ignite 2.0 we will have Memory Policies, and multiple
caches will be able to reuse the same policy. Since the memory size will be
defined at the policy level, it will essentially solve this problem.

Am I wrong?

D.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Igor Rudyak <irudyak@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com> wrote=
:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I=E2=80=99ve faced with such injuries as well and this feature sounds r=
easonable
> > for me.
> >
> > However, is this going to be supported in the new memory architecture t=
he
> > community has been working on? Alex G., can you comment?
> >
> > =E2=80=94
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:07 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> > valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I'm seeing more and more requests from users to add an option to
> specify
> > > the off-heap memory limit globally, for all the caches in total.
> > Currently
> > > we allow this only on per-cache level, which can be not very usable
> > > sometimes.
> > >
> > > E.g., imagine that you have 100GB of RAM and two caches with 50GB lim=
it
> > for
> > > each of them. At some point one of the caches can consume all 50GB,
> while
> > > the second is almost empty. You can't add anything to the first cache
> > > regardless of the fact that you still have lots of memory available.
> > >
> > > Can we add such parameter?
> > >
> > > -Val
> >
> >
>

--001a114e6082ade6a3053c9111b9--