Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173F3200B84 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:52:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 15FA7160AC5; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5895E160AA9 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:52:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 78524 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2016 13:52:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 78507 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2016 13:52:19 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:52:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E236BC3B12 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:52:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.068 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.068 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_HEX=0.331, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL=0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5=0.001, RCVD_IN_PSBL=2.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.124, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kq6yBC-PFmOE for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from m50-132.163.com (m50-132.163.com [123.125.50.132]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id B56AA60D72 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:52:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version; bh=sJvxs WxxSCOB3jwBhC5hZhPz6ZWJzXqaXGFwlDO9sqM=; b=Rq6xBiI+eig7IVaNzKIJH hRlOKPMFdA7gVhdPgUCCJ1dnkhZ09llH8xw1uiDS+SCAZce2lAL8h4syiNO5oDEt DD2IMA+zz/a8QgDkBiefCY3FxdDYg1piQaQTcVm6Uf5svhVKpNBkl74YgrqLmnMW 0fEiTuNcjJGzLuxlhg2JlQ= Received: from liyujuematoMacBook-Air.local (unknown [60.16.198.152]) by smtp2 (Coremail) with SMTP id DNGowAB3SywAP+FXquAECg--.53203S2; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 21:52:06 +0800 (CST) To: dev@ignite.apache.org From: =?UTF-8?B?5p2O546J54+PQDE2Mw==?= <18624049226@163.com> Subject: about isolated ignite clusters on the same set of machines Message-ID: <8b306455-ad2c-f6dc-8faa-bae8a0e49e99@163.com> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 21:52:08 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID: DNGowAB3SywAP+FXquAECg--.53203S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoW7Wr1rGF1ruw4kur1kAr43KFg_yoW3KwbE9a 4v9FyDK345Xa1UWa45Gr1S9FZ7Zw4Uu3W8Xw13Jr1fA34vvF47Z3Z7ta4Yqr1rJrZ0q39x K3s29F1Sq3y2gjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU5QjjPUUUUU== X-Originating-IP: [60.16.198.152] X-CM-SenderInfo: pvdktzbdstjqqrwthudrp/xtbBRQjqjVO-34Mv3QAAso archived-at: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:52:21 -0000 Guys: in our network, we want to isolate some of the machine to build cluster for testing, I looked at the following document,also do the test, but found that this document may not be correct: https://apacheignite.readme.io/v1.7/docs/cluster-config#isolated-ignite-clusters-on-the-same-set-of-machin If the addresses property of TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder is set to 127.0.0.1, multiple ignite nodes started in the same machine,is the isolation of cluster, has nothing to do with the localPort attribute, if do not set the addresses property, even if the localPort property of TcpDiscoverySpi and TcpCommunicationSpi are diff, also belong to the same cluster. The way I think is to set the IP address list for the addresses property, but it doesn't look elegant, does anyone in the community know the right, or elegant way?