Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E546619230 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2795 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2016 00:44:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 2747 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2016 00:44:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 2736 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2016 00:44:12 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:44:12 +0000 Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com (mail-qk0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 4A0191A003F for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id n130so386796qke.3 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:44:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWOZHW0OwoZcZKsMK/xguQsKslLyZh5yTAHzG/diorDVxoanEpEzmUGNyUdzCYOKW/1Hh95FAZl36AjRjNw X-Received: by 10.55.12.68 with SMTP id 65mr28736qkm.69.1460421851455; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:44:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.96.247 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:43:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dmitriy Setrakyan Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:43:32 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: moving to geronimo JCache jar To: dev@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114c8c94add24905303ef572 --001a114c8c94add24905303ef572 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I would say that we are OK with alpha for now, as there is no real difference between 1.0-alpha and 1.0. We can switch to 1.0 whenever geronimo project updates the JAR. D. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote: > Folks, > > I tried to switch to Geronimo and it works fine for me. Are we going to > wait for version 1.0, or we're OK with alpha? > > -Val > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan > wrote: > > > Igniters, > > > > Can someone check if the Geronimo JCache jar is the same as the JSR107? > > > > > > > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec > > > > We should try switching to the Geronimo JAR starting next release, as it > is > > licensed under Apache 2.0. > > > > D. > > > --001a114c8c94add24905303ef572--