ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raul Kripalani <ra...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Contributions that are waiting for review
Date Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:08:39 GMT
Cool! Do you think you can host it at GridGain?

Else, we could run it as a Jenkins job in the ASF Jenkins.

Regards,

*Raúl Kripalani*
PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
Messaging Engineer
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
Blog: raul.io | twitter: @raulvk <https://twitter.com/raulvk>

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupitsyn@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> +1 for Raul, great idea.
> We can also include a column with "days since last update" to see how long
> each issue has been waiting.
>
> I have some experience with JIRA REST API, so maybe I could help with this.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Raul Kripalani <raulk@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > How about a nightly job that fetches all tickets from JIRA which are
> > unresolved and have Patch Available = true, and (1) sends them to the dev
> > ML or (2) posts it in Gitter?
> >
> > Will it help raise awareness and put them on the radar?
> >
> > Raúl.
> > On 2 Mar 2016 20:47, "Denis Magda" <dmagda@gridgain.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I would better ask contributors to ping committers on the dev list
> when a
> > > patch is available asking for review.
> > > It can happen that committers missed or forgot to do the review and a
> > > contributor can remind them sending one more email to the dev list.
> > >
> > > I don't see anything wrong with this approach. It's an open source
> > project
> > > and most of the people don't keep an eye on new contributions that have
> > to
> > > be released.
> > >
> > > PATCH_AVAILABLE stat is a right point. But I won't execute this filter
> > all
> > > the time checking for pending reviews and some of the committers don't
> > move
> > > the ticket to the CLOSED state when everything is merged.
> > > The latter was discussed some time ago there.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Denis
> > >
> > > On 3/2/2016 6:02 PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> > >
> > >> Denis,
> > >>
> > >> We have a special status at Ignite JIRA - PATCH AVAILABLE which means
> > that
> > >> issue ready to be reviewed.
> > >> Currently 59 issues has such status according to
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-2&jql=project%20%3D%20Ignite%20and%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22
> > >>
> > >> I think we have to add notes that this status can be used only during
> > >> waiting of review and we will have no problems with actual "required
> > >> review" list in future.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Roman Shtykh
> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.invalid
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I have also asked for review of the following tickets but failed to
> get
> > a
> > >>> feedback.
> > >>> They are not complicated, but I would appreciate a quick review.
> Thank
> > >>> you!
> > >>>
> > >>> [IGNITE-2563] Queries: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when using
> > BOOL_AND
> > >>>
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2563
> > >>>
> > >>> IGNITE-2416 TcpDiscoverySharedFsIpFinder doesn't work with IPv6
> > addresses
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2416
> > >>>
> > >>> and a new one
> > >>>
> > >>> IGNITE-2710 Session not unbind from current request after invoking
> > >>> request.getSession().invalidate()
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2710
> > >>>
> > >>> -Roman
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 6:38 PM, Denis Magda <
> dmagda@gridgain.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Ignite committers,
> > >>>
> > >>> There is a number of contributions that have to be reviewed.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please pick them up basing on your experience and provide your review
> > >>> notes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Ignite 2718: Missing ZookeeperIpFinder dependencies
> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2718>
> > >>> IGNITE-2693: withKeepBinary and non-binary marshallers
> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2693>
> > >>> IGNITE-2735: Fixes distributed semaphore local node stopping issue.
> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2735>
> > >>> *IGNITE-642: Implements cache distributed reentrant lock
> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-642>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> *Regards,
> > >>> Denis
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message