Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGcMBHiB5+muWx4Rapy=MDHSwQp0bBCR7Pnk4+9dWZZvN1pXfg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPJKmXkk51YLbGO8xwZ7bncdOymfGenT42qo+aLUYqav7b5iuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+0=VoW10VNVO=G9xTdPomOA15m-B7v_BrRsJkBmDf+FcghO6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGcMBHiB5+muWx4Rapy=MDHSwQp0bBCR7Pnk4+9dWZZvN1pXfg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:21:05 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+0=VoURusSd_i7V-uD=qtAH-kXYf_zX-b_ndO7m8r8jJ6V5jw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Binary ID mapper that uses a simple name of classes.
To: dev@ignite.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137c77211000c052951090d

--001a1137c77211000c052951090d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhdanov@apache.org> wrote:

> I would suggest "SimpleClassNameBinaryIdMapper"
>

Is it consistent? Do we have other classes in the same package that start
with word Binary? If not, then I agree.


>
> --Yakov
>
> 2016-01-14 4:59 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>:
>
> > I like the last one too.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Artem Shutak <ashutak@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2191
> (Binary
> > > marshaller: support user classes with the same simple name) bug.
> > >
> > > The fix expects new BinaryIdMapper that uses a simple name of classes.
> It
> > > is required for supporting of platforms (.Net. C++).
> > >
> > > I would be glade to hear suggestions about good name for this mapper.
> > >
> > > I propose the following:
> > > - BinaryPlatformIdMapper
> > > - BinaryInteropIdMapper
> > > - SimpleNameBinaryIdMapper
> > > - BinarySimpleNameIdMapper
> > >
> > > I like the last one, but it has a big length.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -- Artem --
> > >
> >
>

--001a1137c77211000c052951090d--