Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org
Subject: Re: About IgniteAtomicReference
To: dev@ignite.apache.org
References: <5b9430d6.4f6f.1525292baa9.Coremail.18624049226@163.com>
 <CA+0=VoUVKjsCDNKDm61nK4GPYo3TEcuF5RComPMfkxogjwK3Ag@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?5p2O546J54+PQDE2Mw==?= <18624049226@163.com>
Message-ID: <569E2B63.9030804@163.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:26:11 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+0=VoUVKjsCDNKDm61nK4GPYo3TEcuF5RComPMfkxogjwK3Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi：

I am concerned about the IgniteAtomicSequence, which function is 
distributed ID generator, so the performance is very important. I don't 
think IgniteAtomicReference has a performance problem.

The solution of the distributed ID generator is very much, the technical 
route is different, applicable scene is also different, the simple 
comparison of performance is not significant.

I think to refer to the developers, the official gives a specific 
hardware performance data can be, the remaining let developers 
themselves to make a choice, such as: 4*core 2.4GHz, 16g memory,no 
reserve, every second can generate 10000 ID.

In addition, the performance of IgniteAtomicSequence may related to the 
performance of cache nodes, therefore, AtomicConfiguration, whether it 
is necessary to add an attribute, similar nodeFilter such, let 
developers control a distributed datastructure cache deployed on the 
nodes with high performance.

Thanks!

在 16/1/19 16:50, Dmitriy Setrakyan 写道:
> Yujue Li, what exactly would you like to benchmark? Is it the
> IgniteAtomicSequence or IgniteAtomicReference? Also, benchmarks are better
> viewed in comparison to something else. Is there something else in
> particular you would like to compare these data structures to?
>
> D.
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 7:31 PM, 李玉珏 <18624049226@163.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> About IgniteAtomicReference, I think the function in the existing
>> distributed ID generator advantage is very obvious, if converted to
>> hexadecimal, can do a very short。
>>
>> I would like to ask, is there a particular description about the
>> performance? Did the benchmark test on a specific hardware?