Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8792018CCF for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 02:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1345 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2015 02:56:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 1299 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2015 02:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 1281 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2015 02:56:00 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 02:56:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9A863C143C for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 02:55:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.999 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gridgain-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eRjuw6tFm7uK for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 02:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f176.google.com (mail-yk0-f176.google.com [209.85.160.176]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4A6BF20229 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 02:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykba77 with SMTP id a77so76964103ykb.2 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:55:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gridgain-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eoaCXU251w3JzezpuYfg3W1MdHtCfmYq619ae6J9qaI=; b=Q/gjR87uMMoiAPQqLBzubUp+ryNKvke9jfz7NvycImMnAR0bB1jPVWKxnxH1ACt3dp QHelWSxYwrdDs86BRMzUp+vk0Qn7mCPw47Hh9WfqdWQlNccUndLs3z3h5uut29+xgnt2 xGQWoPb1yawGi4jP9r9+RTACgcXaS0rC1rAYgtL9Ow0sOMrvU2sVFH9lLCAm7GK0kXRd QQVpiEptgM+ykHWgcLx2TgRtUdldNVxI37Bz/I65JOv3Rfv2qGhUQeFgYpfHo0StwEMs yKLr7YFFpSj4+q3o2WppuPj3FICYwJGxqTaQYjX6yStyjk0sS8MXiswA6U2smrPrls9e PE7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eoaCXU251w3JzezpuYfg3W1MdHtCfmYq619ae6J9qaI=; b=F+bE4mGVxL9FMhevXbxhaUOfN+YavHIqcQxHVFgMxTutfmmDim/24FhQvPnjCAz4yx 2jauGwbZHWqlSxd5DKHKFaGfukHdPGrnRTelREN3XLltCpNB/rVxI1SSEyqm4JnrNCCM 03jNSsnJFZw5OuhIUUrVU2HvjFteqI6iNfyc8jqYWTgh2y9H0K38UnWHuY0E0fZSTylx tn+OC5Pcm8tzhbMsRvI51PkZ1CIc8p2GpM14LA7YUe2OBJW6BFpA45yTUPOwWq6NhFbG edJUrpBbU6wPXzsQkE69jnhpOccmxkJV6LuLAK5lxU8jJ0XbTfAipyK6h+fc2q05tem1 RKJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/stjCh9s53nuMMiJrQIgdPJ0R+TkEt5xJWYyh8XhaCkq/k7b1JNBAlK4jq2Mel9IC7bYZ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.13.240.133 with SMTP id z127mr21015359ywe.171.1448506551199; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:55:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.13.235.212 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:55:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151126023334.GE28434@tpx> References: <20151126023334.GE28434@tpx> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:55:51 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update scala to 2.11.7 and spark to 1.5.2 From: Alexey Kuznetsov To: dev@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c030bd870a1c8052568b629 --94eb2c030bd870a1c8052568b629 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cos, not sure that I understand what do you mean... I looked into sparck pom.xml and see that they also use scala 2.11.7 and also in scala 2.11.7 release notes I see "A 300x more embeddable Scala REPL, brought to you by a team effort with Apache Spark. " Scala 2.11.7 is a bugfix update and I think it is safe to update Ignite from scala 2.11.2 to scala 2.11.7 Could you tell us what is wrong from your point of view? On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Did Spark do it again and bumped the SDK version inside of a subminor > release? > I guess it's time to simply get over the fact that some people just never > learn ;( > > Cos > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 04:53PM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: > > Hi! > > > > How about to update dependencies? > > > > scala to 2.11.7 and spark to 1.5.2 > > > > Any objections? > > > > If no I will create issue and update. > > -- > > Alexey Kuznetsov > > GridGain Systems > > www.gridgain.com > -- Alexey Kuznetsov GridGain Systems www.gridgain.com --94eb2c030bd870a1c8052568b629--