ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexey Kuznetsov <akuznet...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: Ignite-1.5 Release
Date Tue, 03 Nov 2015 22:50:54 GMT
I'm working on IGNITE-1753 Rework CacheJdbcPojoStore to new API (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1753).
Issue is implemented and waiting for  IGNITE-950 to be merged into
ignite-1282.

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Good news for the IGNITE-950 ticket - CI looks good, changes will be merged
> to ignite-1282 integration branch after benchmarks re-run.
>
> 2015-11-03 21:37 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Tikhonov <ntikhonov@gridgain.com>:
>
> > I implemented changes related to IGNITE-426 task. Currently investigating
> > performance degradation for atomic caches. I expect the ticket to be
> merged
> > in 2 days.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > IGNITE-950 is taking more time to be merged than I originally
> estimated.
> > We
> > > had a couple of silly bugs, such as loosing cache operation context on
> > > async cache operations, which led to hard-to debug failures in the
> > platform
> > > integration code.
> > > I also added some sanity checks to indexing and found that I ran
> > benchmarks
> > > for new binary format on a model with externalizable classes, so the
> > result
> > > I've got were invalid, need more time to fix the model and re-run
> > > benchmarks.
> > >
> > > I am currently waiting for another CI run, will give an update in
> several
> > > hours.
> > >
> > > 2015-11-03 17:51 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>:
> > >
> > > > Here are my current status for all interop-related stuff (you can
> view
> > > > these tickets using query "project = IGNITE AND status in (Open, "In
> > > > Progress", Reopened, Resolved, "Patch Available") AND component =
> > interop
> > > > AND fixVersion = 1.5"):
> > > >
> > > > *IGNITE-1819 - Remove metadataEnabled flag in Java*
> > > > Trivial. Waiting for IGNITE-950 merge.
> > > >
> > > > *IGNITE-1845, IGNITE-1846 - portable API renamings in CPP and .Net*
> > > > Trivial. Waiting for IGNITE-950 merge.
> > > >
> > > > *IGNITE-1803 - Optimized field lookup for queries*
> > > > Ready. Waiting for IGNITE-950 to merge.
> > > >
> > > > *IGNITE-1847 - Add "field" method to portable metadata.*
> > > > Not started yet. Waiting for IGNITE-950 to merge.
> > > >
> > > > *IGNITE-1816 - Optionally do not write field IDs to portable object
> > > > footer.*
> > > > Not started yet.
> > > >
> > > > + Several minor tickets.
> > > >
> > > > All in all, I expect all these tickets to be ready in 2 days.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > > > alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm sorry, I meant to write "changes related to IGNITE-1486
> > *ticket*".
> > > > The
> > > > > changes are in ignite-950-new branch because it is a result of work
> > on
> > > > > multiple sub-tickets and it is currently used as an integration
> > branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2015-11-03 1:39 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org
> >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Alexey,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am confused. Why do you have 2 branches?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > D.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > > > > > alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am finalizing changes related to IGNITE-1486 branch.
> Currently
> > > the
> > > > > API
> > > > > > > changes are finished and now I am mostly fixing the CI
tests.
> In
> > > > fact,
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > just submitted the latest fix related to the new .NET platform
> > > > > > > functionality and hope CI tests will pass, in this case
it will
> > be
> > > > > ready
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > be merged tomorrow morning.
> > > > > > > It would be nice if other community members reviewed my
changes
> > in
> > > > > > > ignite-950-new branch before it gets to master.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2015-11-02 22:27 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > > dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks Vladislav!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Would also be nice to get an update from other committers
> > > involved
> > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > outlined tickets. Specifically whether the ticket
has been
> > merged
> > > > to
> > > > > > > master
> > > > > > > > or not, and if not, what should be the expectation.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > D.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Vladisav Jelisavcic
<
> > > > > > > vladisavj@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >10. I would also like to include distributed
Semaphore.
> > > > Vladislav,
> > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > >chance you can finish with it this week?
> > > > > > > > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-
> > > > > > > > > ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426>638
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I will have it done by thursday.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > Vladisav
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
<
> > > > > > > dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:58 AM, M G <endian675@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Can/will this include
> > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1681
> > > > > > > > > > ?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I don’t see why not. Would be nice if
one of the
> committers
> > > > could
> > > > > > > pick
> > > > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > > > the review for this patch.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Anton
Vinogradov <
> > > > > > > > > > avinogradov@gridgain.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Branch ignite-1.5 created.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:39 PM,
Anton Vinogradov <
> > > > > > > > > > > avinogradov@gridgain.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I assume that correct link
at 10th feature is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-638
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:35
PM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> > > > > > > > yzhdanov@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Guys,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> I think we can start
preparation to Ignite-1.5
> > release
> > > > > which
> > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > > include
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> many interesting features:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 1. Portable object API
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1486
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2. Ignite.NET and Ignite
C++
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1282
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 3. Optimistic serializable
transactions
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1607
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 4. Distributed SQL joins
- we will be able to
> query
> > > > > > > > non-collocated
> > > > > > > > > > > data
> > > > > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> well
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1232
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 5. Enhanced Oracle and
IBM JDK interoperability
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1526
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 6. MQTT streamer
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-535
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 7. Continuous query failover
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 8. Significant transactional
cache performance
> > > > > optimizations
> > > > > > > - I
> > > > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> merge
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> these changes from 'ignite-1.4-slow-server-debug'
> > > today
> > > > or
> > > > > > > > > tomorrow.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 9. Many stability and
fault-tolerance fixes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 10. I would also like
to include distributed
> > > Semaphore.
> > > > > > > > Vladislav,
> > > > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> chance you can finish
with it this week?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426
> > >638
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks to everyone involved!
Guys, esp. assignees
> of
> > > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > > > issues,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> please respond to this
email and let us know when
> > can
> > > we
> > > > > > > expect
> > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> changes being merged
to master and release branch?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Can someone create ignite-1.5
release branch?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> --Yakov
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Alexey Kuznetsov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message