ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: Ignite-1.5 Release
Date Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:25:54 GMT
Igniters, here is curernt status of platform/portable tickets.

As I understand, IGNITE-950 is almost ready and will be merged very soon.
There are 5 more tickets which depends on it:

*IGNITE-1845*, *IGNITE-1846* - move portable API changes to .Net and C++.
This is a matter of refacotring, should not be a problem.
*IGNITE-1819* - remove "metadata enabled" flag. Also fairly simple ticket.
*IGNITE-1847* - move "field" method from PortableObject to
PortableMetadata. Also should be trivial.
*IGNITE-1816* - optionaly do not write field IDs to footer. Important
ticket, I'm working on it. About ~50% ready.

All in all, none of these tickets are showstoppers for merge of
IGNITE-950/IGNITE-1282 to release branch.

Also I measured query performance on some local benchmarks and got
acceptable resutls - queries are about 5-7% slower with poratbles than with
OptimizedMarshaller. Looks very promising to me provided that we work with
deserialized objects now.


On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <akuznetsov@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> I'm working on IGNITE-1753 Rework CacheJdbcPojoStore to new API (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1753).
> Issue is implemented and waiting for  IGNITE-950 to be merged into
> ignite-1282.
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Good news for the IGNITE-950 ticket - CI looks good, changes will be
> merged
> > to ignite-1282 integration branch after benchmarks re-run.
> >
> > 2015-11-03 21:37 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Tikhonov <ntikhonov@gridgain.com>:
> >
> > > I implemented changes related to IGNITE-426 task. Currently
> investigating
> > > performance degradation for atomic caches. I expect the ticket to be
> > merged
> > > in 2 days.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > > alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > IGNITE-950 is taking more time to be merged than I originally
> > estimated.
> > > We
> > > > had a couple of silly bugs, such as loosing cache operation context
> on
> > > > async cache operations, which led to hard-to debug failures in the
> > > platform
> > > > integration code.
> > > > I also added some sanity checks to indexing and found that I ran
> > > benchmarks
> > > > for new binary format on a model with externalizable classes, so the
> > > result
> > > > I've got were invalid, need more time to fix the model and re-run
> > > > benchmarks.
> > > >
> > > > I am currently waiting for another CI run, will give an update in
> > several
> > > > hours.
> > > >
> > > > 2015-11-03 17:51 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Here are my current status for all interop-related stuff (you can
> > view
> > > > > these tickets using query "project = IGNITE AND status in (Open,
> "In
> > > > > Progress", Reopened, Resolved, "Patch Available") AND component =
> > > interop
> > > > > AND fixVersion = 1.5"):
> > > > >
> > > > > *IGNITE-1819 - Remove metadataEnabled flag in Java*
> > > > > Trivial. Waiting for IGNITE-950 merge.
> > > > >
> > > > > *IGNITE-1845, IGNITE-1846 - portable API renamings in CPP and .Net*
> > > > > Trivial. Waiting for IGNITE-950 merge.
> > > > >
> > > > > *IGNITE-1803 - Optimized field lookup for queries*
> > > > > Ready. Waiting for IGNITE-950 to merge.
> > > > >
> > > > > *IGNITE-1847 - Add "field" method to portable metadata.*
> > > > > Not started yet. Waiting for IGNITE-950 to merge.
> > > > >
> > > > > *IGNITE-1816 - Optionally do not write field IDs to portable object
> > > > > footer.*
> > > > > Not started yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > + Several minor tickets.
> > > > >
> > > > > All in all, I expect all these tickets to be ready in 2 days.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > > > > alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm sorry, I meant to write "changes related to IGNITE-1486
> > > *ticket*".
> > > > > The
> > > > > > changes are in ignite-950-new branch because it is a result
of
> work
> > > on
> > > > > > multiple sub-tickets and it is currently used as an integration
> > > branch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2015-11-03 1:39 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Alexey,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am confused. Why do you have 2 branches?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > D.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > > > > > > alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am finalizing changes related to IGNITE-1486 branch.
> > Currently
> > > > the
> > > > > > API
> > > > > > > > changes are finished and now I am mostly fixing the
CI tests.
> > In
> > > > > fact,
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > just submitted the latest fix related to the new .NET
> platform
> > > > > > > > functionality and hope CI tests will pass, in this
case it
> will
> > > be
> > > > > > ready
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > be merged tomorrow morning.
> > > > > > > > It would be nice if other community members reviewed
my
> changes
> > > in
> > > > > > > > ignite-950-new branch before it gets to master.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2015-11-02 22:27 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > > > dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > > > > >:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks Vladislav!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Would also be nice to get an update from other
committers
> > > > involved
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > outlined tickets. Specifically whether the ticket
has been
> > > merged
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > master
> > > > > > > > > or not, and if not, what should be the expectation.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > D.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Vladisav Jelisavcic
<
> > > > > > > > vladisavj@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >10. I would also like to include distributed
Semaphore.
> > > > > Vladislav,
> > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > >chance you can finish with it this week?
> > > > > > > > > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-
> > > > > > > > > > ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426>638
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I will have it done by thursday.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Vladisav
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Dmitriy
Setrakyan <
> > > > > > > > dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:58 AM, M G
<
> endian675@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Can/will this include
> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1681
> > > > > > > > > > > ?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I don’t see why not. Would be nice
if one of the
> > committers
> > > > > could
> > > > > > > > pick
> > > > > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > > > > the review for this patch.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:51 PM,
Anton Vinogradov <
> > > > > > > > > > > avinogradov@gridgain.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Branch ignite-1.5 created.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:39
PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> > > > > > > > > > > > avinogradov@gridgain.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I assume that correct
link at 10th feature is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-638
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015
at 4:35 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> > > > > > > > > yzhdanov@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Guys,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I think we can start
preparation to Ignite-1.5
> > > release
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > > > include
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> many interesting
features:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 1. Portable object
API
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1486
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2. Ignite.NET and
Ignite C++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1282
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 3. Optimistic serializable
transactions
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1607
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 4. Distributed SQL
joins - we will be able to
> > query
> > > > > > > > > non-collocated
> > > > > > > > > > > > data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> well
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1232
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 5. Enhanced Oracle
and IBM JDK interoperability
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1526
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 6. MQTT streamer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-535
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 7. Continuous query
failover
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 8. Significant transactional
cache performance
> > > > > > optimizations
> > > > > > > > - I
> > > > > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> merge
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> these changes from
> 'ignite-1.4-slow-server-debug'
> > > > today
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > tomorrow.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 9. Many stability
and fault-tolerance fixes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 10. I would also
like to include distributed
> > > > Semaphore.
> > > > > > > > > Vladislav,
> > > > > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> chance you can finish
with it this week?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426
> > > >638
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks to everyone
involved! Guys, esp.
> assignees
> > of
> > > > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > > > > issues,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> please respond to
this email and let us know
> when
> > > can
> > > > we
> > > > > > > > expect
> > > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> changes being merged
to master and release
> branch?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Can someone create
ignite-1.5 release branch?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> --Yakov
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alexey Kuznetsov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message