Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0391184CB for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 23:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71525 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2015 23:36:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 71481 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2015 23:36:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 71467 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2015 23:36:47 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 23:36:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DB8DFC5508 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 23:36:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.899 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jmHnV82ig7V6 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 23:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f48.google.com (mail-vk0-f48.google.com [209.85.213.48]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BF8E920751 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 23:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vkgs66 with SMTP id s66so28920547vkg.1 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:36:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=N5zbH5XW7dOxLhmMG4z2tLyECRQBN7biRr02BUVQKnY=; b=pAkSJjb6RoNYexDWow27nazuaRjk2ucvSMzBt/EemoSbdD4spTjLrHuUc71WXX2AmF N7HLDnAIaL3dcv1WILCOVm/ZzOqi3XRec/Dm1T6Nkd5WkV/FUwa6bjKGGq/TNDWS3Kzn rDlNqAxLL8LHpD91cFwqt9ay7I8Ee5CpQGWOrWX9sAVtf04G2sdn9TFRF2UZUBKkzUkf SVyRaGXtSPzgeAqKFhOcK30VqKTnVrKv97DsgrsTZNZwkG0Bd+WZftHp4Mb0lw/lsCWq NB9e4Rez5g/NM8/wjQDFefu+2dnncNyiB2pMtJqHDpNgAhXhjTTH2RJzx3k3yhb4qvN3 gGoQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.9.81 with SMTP id 78mr19696835vkj.10.1445816192763; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.73.89 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:36:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:36:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ignite vs Hazelcast From: Kostya Kulagin To: dev@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143c0f6948f590522f65021 --001a1143c0f6948f590522f65021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Was this in or off heap test? On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > It is pretry cool to see companies out there using Ignite and comparing > themselves to Iginite. That clearly sets Ignite as the poster child of the > in-memory computing. And that's exactly what an Apache project should be. > Thanks for sharing! > > But perhaps you wanted to also express some thoughts by sending this > around? It is hard to guess what they were from just looking at the link. > > Cheers, > Cos > > On October 25, 2015 11:26:38 AM PDT, chandresh pancholi < > chandreshpancholi007@gmail.com> wrote: > >https://hazelcast.com/resources/benchmark-gridgain/ > --001a1143c0f6948f590522f65021--