Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A02C01898F for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1073 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2015 03:31:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 1031 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2015 03:31:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 1018 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2015 03:31:21 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:31:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 61D9CC2404 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:31:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZd5q5b1uJHB for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net [96.114.154.171]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7F5FC28190 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-po-13v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.237]) by resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ZfVc1r00557bBgG01fVdg3; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:29:37 +0000 Received: from tpx ([24.130.135.131]) by resomta-po-13v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ZfVa1r0022qGB6001fVd5D; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:29:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tpx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3714C201450E0 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 06:29:30 +0300 (MSK) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 06:29:30 +0300 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: dev@ignite.apache.org Subject: Re: Ignite vs Hazelcast Message-ID: <20151026032930.GS28170@tpx> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4PJudQiuYY5+cwwi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1445830177; bh=9YtXP50YN7qZKb5NcVs+vInuWxsx81M+cURRb/hk1Q8=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Hd0oqDoHWgxMzTBlrHkDXHBhZVxfgV26FpOil278oLJRh3EUNL6ING/LQ03/3m/Qd IU2oZyr80XIEftbvcHyP//SJusr87boWUo8iLUtpLhtPZqVtE1+hyBzIvWBdE5cLJL CwNztPY75FIaOFUuRQrAsK8mEHu/jVpD4tdRz7EUl1FOguGNoPPDKPgWeyi6ZRYXYg WIe1SxsnwRQzVABE2r/mYrRMDlklhvu3QhrcvFBSPazq7mHVWHMe2TJ27DW46AiuoA RPW8+ol/AEzEZz3bpZnpLyNBFnWIXAwjChjr9QXQRgrowTOgec93dAcAdKBpQTZgJI 1ZwFlzumwFpNQ== --4PJudQiuYY5+cwwi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:36PM, Kostya Kulagin wrote: > Was this in or off heap test? That's exactly why I asked the OP to share his thoughts - otherwise, it is just a slightly amusing reading at best ;) > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrot= e: >=20 > > It is pretry cool to see companies out there using Ignite and comparing > > themselves to Iginite. That clearly sets Ignite as the poster child of = the > > in-memory computing. And that's exactly what an Apache project should b= e. > > Thanks for sharing! > > > > But perhaps you wanted to also express some thoughts by sending this > > around? It is hard to guess what they were from just looking at the lin= k. > > > > Cheers, > > Cos > > > > On October 25, 2015 11:26:38 AM PDT, chandresh pancholi < > > chandreshpancholi007@gmail.com> wrote: > > >https://hazelcast.com/resources/benchmark-gridgain/ > > --4PJudQiuYY5+cwwi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlYtnhoACgkQenyFlstYjhJSCgD/dJepfBaop6mQRkGTlPgqYBe/ jLOhQem8HLYeQLm0QCYBAMgtYbk4rmnFwf49N5OBDTM+tIjtIVZhAIT9angg4vBf =LuZ2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4PJudQiuYY5+cwwi--