ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: .Net: separate methods for async operations.
Date Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:41:05 GMT
Example with Get() operation:

async Task<int> GetAndMultiply() {
    // This line is executed in current thread.
    Task<int> res = cache.GetAsync(1);

    await res;

    // This code is executed in another thread when res is ready.
    int mul = res.Result * res.Result;

    return mul;
}

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Guys, let's try keeping this topic focused on .Net please, because the
> > product is not released yet and we can create any API we like.
> >
> > Dima, answering your question about async/await - this is actually native
> > continuation support in .Net. Consider the following .Net method:
> >
> > async void PutAndPrint() {
> >     await cache.PutAsync(1, 1);
> >
> >     Console.WriteLine("Put value to cache.");
> > }
> >
>
> And what if the method putAsync would return a value. How would this code
> change?
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message