ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Boudnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Ignite 1.5 plans
Date Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:29:44 GMT
One of the reasons is that I don't believe that running two builds to get two
different module assemblies is a right or useful idea. I can use reactor to
build just what's needed, but looks like it won't produce specific assemblies,
because spark is included into core package. hence, I would have to move the
jars selection logic into the packaging, which seems orthogonal to the case
at hands.

As for the intersection of the two: will Spark more often intersect with the
data fabric core, you think?

Cos

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:58AM, Nikita Ivanov wrote:
> Cos - why mixing the two? I think if we are embark on this route - why not
> create two different assemblies, one for Hadoop bits, and another for Spark
> integration? Two would rarely intersect IMHO.
> 
> --
> Nikita Ivanov
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > While a  minor modification which won't affect anything, I'd like to put
> > on the table the consolidation of hadoodp and spark bits into
> > ignite-accelerator assembly. The fix is ready and I was just waiting for
> > 1.4 to come out.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On September 28, 2015 11:11:44 AM PDT, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > vozerov@gridgain.com> wrote:
> > >I'd like to add several things.
> > >1) It looks like fix for IBM JVM will brake backward compatibility
> > >because
> > >the problem is caused by missing serialVersionId, right?
> > >2) HP-UX users are also concerned, see last comments in
> > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1493 I think we must
> > >adress
> > >Unsafe refactoring in this release as well.
> > >
> > >On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
> > ><dsetrakyan@apache.org>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Gianfranco,
> > >>
> > >> I am not too familiar with JBPM. Can you make a case on why we may
> > >need
> > >> this integration and how it will benefit Ignite users?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> D.
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Gianfranco Murador
> > ><murador@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I would like to propose the integration with JBPM ,
> > >> >  I think I can finish in a couple of weeks since I have a bit of
> > >time to
> > >> > devote to Ignite.
> > >> >  Let me know if you agree.
> > >> > Regards, Gianfranco
> > >> >
> > >> > 2015-09-28 18:50 GMT+02:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan
> > ><dsetrakyan@apache.org>:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I would like to add one more:
> > >> > > 10. OSGI integration - Raul Kripalani
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Raul, hopefully you will have time to finish it.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Also, if anyone in the community wants to propose a feature they
> > >are
> > >> > > working on which can be finished within next couple of weeks,
it
> > >should
> > >> > get
> > >> > > into 1.5 as well.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > D.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Yakov Zhdanov
> > ><yzhdanov@apache.org>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Guys!
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > We have finalized 1.4 release!
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks to everyone involved! That was very important release
> > >for our
> > >> > > > project.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Let's discuss scope for 1.5.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I think the main focus areas should be:
> > >> > > > 1. Optimized marshaller rework - Alex Goncharuk works on
this.
> > >> > > > 2. .Net and Cpp API release (depends on 3) - Vladimir Ozerov
> > >> > > > 3. Portable API release - Denis Magda and Vladimir
> > >> > > > 4. Failover for continuous query notifications - Nick Tikhonov
> > >> > > > 5. Cache Rebalancing optimizations - Anton Vinogradov
> > >> > > > 6. Fix compatibility with IBM JDK
> > >> > > > 7. Cache stability and performance fixes (as many as possible)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Nice to have:
> > >> > > > 8. Finish vert.x integration - Andrey Gura works on this.
> > >> > > > 9. Finish node.js integration - I think Semyon should pass
it
> > >over to
> > >> > > > someone else, given he is busy with cache. Anyone? Andrey
Gura?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Comments are welcome!
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-950
> > >> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1282
> > >> > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1258
> > >> > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426
> > >> > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1093
> > >> > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-324
> > >> > > > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1526
> > >> > > > [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1345
> > >> > > > [8] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1079
> > >> > > > [9] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-961
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --Yakov
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Gianfranco Murador
> > >> > Igniter and Software Engineer.
> > >> >
> > >>
> >

Mime
View raw message